Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$10
per month per user
OneNote
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's OneNote is a digital note-taking app, supporting photos, annotating, web page clipping, emailing, and synchronizing notes across devices.
N/A
Pricing
Miro
OneNote
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Microsoft OneNote
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Miro
OneNote
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
Most similar to OneNote in terms of functionality, but much more lightweight and less clunky, with much better UI and templates but perhaps slightly fewer features. The notion is much better for quick note/meeting minute-taking but lacks the unstructured formatting style of …
I have not used many products like Miro. In the past, I have tried using OneNote, but the functionality is limited and frustrating. Occasionally, I have used Canva to organize more graphic design-focused projects, such as mood boards. But in general, my needs for Canva and Miro …
Miro, Lucidchart, and OneNote each offer unique features for collaboration and note-taking, catering to different needs. Miro stands out as an exceptional visual collaboration tool, enabling remote teams to brainstorm and work together in real time. Its virtual whiteboard …
Miro stands out from OneNote primarily due to its focus on interactive, real-time collaboration and visual project management. Unlike OneNote's strength in hierarchical note-taking and integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, Miro offers an infinite canvas that facilitates …
Miro is more versatile for live use, whilst also being handy for presentations (where Prezi is quite strong). Overall, Miro is much stronger and versatile
pros and cons with each. I describe Miro as the wild wild west. I can be utilized just about any way you wish, and governance is difficult to control. In contrast, many other platforms lack the flexibility, but adds an element of consistency and structure.
I like Miro specifically for its brainstorming and whiteboard uses. I still use Asana and Planner for planning out timelines or assigning specific tasks.
I have used Visio and Lucid in the past; they are not great. The biggest competitor, I think, is Excalidraw. It's free and works great for stuff other than the group collaboration piece. I think it might do that, too, but I don't pay for it. It beats Miro on quick and fast …
I find Miro to be a superior tool, other tools I have used became unresponsive or too slow to be effective in the roles and jobs I needed them to do. I am currently working in a Miro board with over 1000 discrete elements and it loads fast, I can maneuver and work with the …
When it comes to process visualization, Miro is the finest by far. Nothing compares to it, however I've attempted to use it in place of properly labeled and/or colored folders in SharePoint, for example, and it just doesn't work out this way for keeping information and critical …
Miro is by far the best for visualization of processes. Nothing is quite like it, however for storing information and important files, I've tried to do this but it just doesn't work out as well as having clearly labeled and/or colored folders in SharePoint for example. Some …
We were originally using Mural, but it did not satisfy our company's security standards and we also had a lot of issues with it freezing when we would have more than ~10 people collaborating on the board at once, so we made the switch to Miro back in 2020. At first, Miro felt …
Confluence can be used well for instructions and documentation. But it does not work for workshops or brainstorming, as content and ideas cannot be visualised clearly.
Miro is so much easier to use with a mouse and keyboard. It is easier to create impactful diagrams and track tasks than any other product on the list. I can move faster and teach people to use the tool faster than any other option. Adding and connecting pics/screenshots is easy …
Miro is much more intuitive tool and has a lot of different useful features. Real-time collaboration where you can see your team moves makes it even easier. The way you can present ideas and share among the organization proves high level of tool functionality. Working with Miro …
Figma has much better interface for creating wireframes and designing UI. Miro does a better job for the casual user who is just trying to collaborate with team members or plan projects
MURAL is similar, but I do not like the restriction on the project size and number of panels - Miro reduces some of these unnecessary barriers. Otherwise, I don't remember the other big differences between the two very similar product. I do think the naming is a little strange, …
MURAL - comparable, cheaper than Miro, but not as intuitive, user-friendly, and feature-rich. I would use MURAL as needed and really your top competitor. It is missing the fluid of selection. Bluescape - is inferior in most parts but FedRAMPed MS Whiteboard - flawed in every way …
Miro is better at sharing/live collaborating, editing, saving that version in a spot accessible to all so that I don't have to worry about someone creating a copy version or linking to something outdated.
It does so much more and the user experience is a lot better. I can more easily search and find the right spaces, share them with colleagues and organise the work into groups. The collaboration features really set it apart. Even though it has some room to get better, it’s ‘good …
I am just more familiar with Miro. And I really dislike how draw.io looks, it looks very 1990s, and I am not sure if it is because of my setting or not, but when my co-worker makes an update there, I don't see updates in real-time. I can only see it after my co-worker saved it.