NGINX Ingress Controller vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

NGINX Ingress Controller

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
NGINX Ingress Controller	Score 7.9 out of 10	N/A	NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.	N/A
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud	Score 8.1 out of 10	N/A	Prisma Cloud, from Palo Alto Networks (based on technology acquired with Evident.io, or the Evident Security Platform) is presented as a comprehensive Cloud Native Security Platform (CNSP) that delivers full lifecycle security and full stack protection for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments. The solution is dedicated to reducing attack surface and checking for vulnerabilities against known or custom signatures of threats and provides daily risk reports, and also detects what users were…	N/A

Pricing

NGINX Ingress Controller

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
NGINX Ingress Controller	Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	NGINX Ingress Controller	Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Top Pros	No answers on this topic	Pro Graphical user Pro Ci cd Pro User interface
Top Cons	No answers on this topic	Minus Learning material Minus Help the user Minus Features missing

Features

NGINX Ingress Controller

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

Container Management

Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
	NGINX Ingress Controller 7.8 2 Ratings 1% below category average	Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud - Ratings
Security and Isolation	7.52 Ratings	00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization	7.52 Ratings	00 Ratings
Discovery Tools	8.21 Ratings	00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks	7.52 Ratings	00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery	7.92 Ratings	00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging	7.92 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	NGINX Ingress Controller	Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Small Businesses	Portainer Score 9.3 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	NGINX Ingress Controller	Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend	7.9 (2 ratings)	8.7 (5 ratings)

User Testimonials
	NGINX Ingress Controller	Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend	F5 Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications. Incentivized AS Amit Setia Senior Engineer] Read full review	Palo Alto Networks Finding specific Cloud Vendor specific Cloud resource configuration, tags, network information and etc. is fairly easy to do. Cloud alert capabilities are pretty good and with proper knowledge top notch alerts can be created. Only downside I can think of is ease of use. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	F5 Provide access to containers Manage traffic Route traffic Lightweight Near to zero downtime Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Palo Alto Networks Vulnerability assessment using Twistlock Enhancing Security by scanning workload based on different Security standards and provide a compliance report CF template integration with CI/CD pipeline to identify any security issue before workload are deployed IAM/UEBA features additional to enchaining security posture Auto remediation Integration is simple and solution is supported on multiple cloud Customized dashboard/queries Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	F5 Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see. Incentivized AS Amit Setia Senior Engineer] Read full review	Palo Alto Networks Real-time supports would be much appreciated. At the moment they have a third-party ticketing support tool, which can be replaced with real-time support, which can be provided to the user at the time of the issue. The user should be provided with all the learning material by the Palo Alto team at the time of license purchase. This would save a lot of users' time, which is taken up by research and finding the correct documents from the website. Themes can be introduced in the feature set, which would help the user customize the software as per their needs. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	F5 We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Palo Alto Networks Our organization didn't consider any other tool, and so far we are pretty much satisfied with Prisma Cloud. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	F5 Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress Cost optimization is one of the business objective Incentivized AS Amit Setia Senior Engineer] Read full review	Palo Alto Networks Investigation time is severely reduced Has potential to identify misconfigurations Hard to setup Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots