OpenText Documentum vs. PDFfiller

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Documentum
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
PDFfiller
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
pdfFiller is a comprehensive online document management platform that provides businesses with the services of form-building, PDFs editing and e-signing. The vendor says their tools help businesses to streamline document management, make workflows fully paperless, freeing up time and resources through intuitive process automation.
$8
per month
Pricing
OpenText DocumentumPDFfiller
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$8
per month
Basic
$8
per month
Plus
$12
per month
Plus
$12
per month
Premium
$15
per month
Premium
$15
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText DocumentumPDFfiller
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptional$8 per user/month
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText DocumentumPDFfiller
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
9.2
7 Ratings
11% above category average
PDFfiller
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText DocumentumPDFfiller
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.9 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.9 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText DocumentumPDFfiller
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
9.3
(51 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(4 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(24 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(28 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText DocumentumPDFfiller
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
Read full review
airSlate, Inc
I chose to hit #9. I believe we all have abilities to broaden our needs so for the majority you may end up thinking this is a 10 if having used comparison tools or remembering those times when a certain "other" signature and document completion tool didn't go as planned or seemed less familiar. I will always welcome the clients and professionals who need my response to send their documents to me for PDF filling. On the random flip when I have to have communication rapidly flow on the go in a last minute piece of time, these people will receive my PDF™ items. And if tips and tools are necessary, they are rather easily placed where they can be worked out by anyone.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
  • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
  • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
Read full review
airSlate, Inc
  • Create and edit forms with ease.
  • Send forms out for signature and field completion to clients, vendors, and employees.
  • Saved us a ton of time and space around the office, since we have been able to eliminate the fax machine and scanner.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
  • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
Read full review
airSlate, Inc
  • multiple users can not login at the same time. When the 2nd user login to the same account, it will logged out the 1st user automatically.
  • For using advanced features of this software users need to pay a lot. It's very expensive.
  • Unavailability of task manager. It can help users to add their tasks on the dashboard itself and give reminders of those tasks.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review
airSlate, Inc
I will always be a faithful PDFfiller customer. The product has saved me a lot of time over the years and I find a great deal of value in the platform. If I move on to another company someday, PDFfiller will be going with me wherever I go.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
airSlate, Inc
I don't fully understand all the features and I could probably be using it better, especially the templates. The organisation of exisiting files could be better (ie similar to folders on a pc/laptop). I haven't really invested much time into exploring it further than filling out forms; There possibly is an organisation solution I haven't discovered yet
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Read full review
airSlate, Inc
If you need help, you can easily search for it and find online tutorials that walk you through how to do specific things step by step. You do not have to read a 20 page manual or sit for a 10 hour training session, it is refreshing that you can take it at your own pace and learn things as you need to
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No answers on this topic
airSlate, Inc
When I was hired on by my current company I was already a paying customer, so I just brought it with me. Once I showed our President/Founder how simple it was to use for our contracts, agreements, and NDAs, it has been a staple in our company ever since. That was almost 3 years ago. We've closed quicker because of the speed at which we can turn signed docs around.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
Read full review
airSlate, Inc
I have used other editors such as Adobe Acrobat and, in my opinion, for the money Adobe costs, if the need is just to edit pdf I would go with PDFfiller. It is a really easy tool to use. It's learning curve is not that steep and it does pretty much everything I need from it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
  • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
  • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
Read full review
airSlate, Inc
  • not traveling with a printer
  • able to do work a lot faster
  • documents always look very professional
  • all the paperwork i need to fill out is typed, not handwritten into forms which looks much more professional. Almost as if I had an assistant to type out my documents
  • I love the fact that I can make an edit to an existing PDF. I dont have to go back and forth and ask for editable copies of word documents, etc.
Read full review
ScreenShots

PDFfiller Screenshots

Screenshot of Documents can be uploaded and then editedScreenshot of Includes a free iOs and Android app to manage documents on the go.Screenshot of Editor's interface with a sticky noteScreenshot of Text fields' optionsScreenshot of E-signing via pdfFillerScreenshot of Sharing options & other functionalities