SAT from KB4
January 12, 2024
SAT from KB4
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Training Access Level II (Gold & Platinum)
Modules Used
- KnowBe4
- The Security Awareness Company
Overall Satisfaction with KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training
Mainly bi-monthly training sessions + continuous phishing simulations.
- language support
- reporting capabilities
- enduser portal
- excluding users that are long-term absent
- reporting capabilities eg who failed x trainings per department or country
- awareness
- more secure
KB4 has a broader training catalogue with more support for languages
Phished has better phishing simulations for the local (Belgian) market.
Phished has better phishing simulations for the local (Belgian) market.
Do you think KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training's feature set?
Yes
Did KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training again?
Yes
Since we are planning to train our end-users on a regular (monthly or bi-monthly) basis, it is very important that new, fresh trainings (in the different languages) is provided regularly.
Otherwise we will need to change to another product when all trainings have been rollout out.
Also new content eg. A.I. within the enterprise are needed
Otherwise we will need to change to another product when all trainings have been rollout out.
Also new content eg. A.I. within the enterprise are needed
import via AAD
Report on which users has not completed a mandatory training grouped per country or department.
If possible linked to the number of failed phishing mails clicked.
Today we also have a manual report that is send out to each enduser (on a manual yearly basis) that gives him an overview of his (personal) last year:
This includes: number of trainings (incl number completed, time needed to complete), number of simulated phishing mails received (incl clicked, opened and reported), number of mails reported via the PAB (from PhishER) (and how many where indeed seen as threat)
If possible linked to the number of failed phishing mails clicked.
Today we also have a manual report that is send out to each enduser (on a manual yearly basis) that gives him an overview of his (personal) last year:
This includes: number of trainings (incl number completed, time needed to complete), number of simulated phishing mails received (incl clicked, opened and reported), number of mails reported via the PAB (from PhishER) (and how many where indeed seen as threat)