Overall Satisfaction with Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection
We switched to Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection after using several other antivirus systems, including McAfee, ESET, and Trend Micro. It's being used across the entire organization. We rely on it to keep our machines safe from malware, spyware, and ransomware attacks. So far, it's been pretty reliable and has a very light footprint, so it doesn't use up many resources. We've been using it for two years so far, and no complaints.
- Light footprint
- Affordable
- Can be used in conjunction with Windows Defender or other third-party antivirus solutions
- End user functionality is limited--can only launch scans. Would be nice to offer more features for the end user.
- Some updates must be done or at least approved manually, instead of automatic updating.
- It catches some false positives, so they need to tone down the aggressiveness somewhat.
- Affordable price
- Full features and control
- Good support system in case of issues or questions
- Positive effect on ROI since the software is relatively affordable
- Keeps us from having to clean and remediate machines, therefore another positive on ROI
- Free included support with the license--a nice feature
In the past, we've used McAfee, ESET, and Trend Micro. Each of these has their pros and cons, and all are variably priced. They are all overall "good enough" antivirus software, but what makes Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection stand out more is that it's more affordable, it's simpler, and it has the ability to work in conjunction with other antivirus platforms, including Windows Defender.
Do you think ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes's feature set?
Yes
Did ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes again?
Yes