Overall Satisfaction with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
We are end-users of Oracle, as it is used by one of our Clients. This program is used for the management of construction-related projects, the issuance of contracts, changes, monthly draws, and hold-back applications. It also manages documentation related to compliance and contracts compliance, H&S back up, and more.
- Contract Management
- Progress Billing
- Construction Management
- Change Order Issuance
- Payment Applications
- Ability to request a change.
- Upload of documents directly by the end user.
- Direct inquiry of the client on a draw.
- Allowed for early progress payment processing.
- Costs end user fees for set up and changes.
- Does not allow for inquiry on old payments.
Oracle is better laid out and has more functionality as well as end-user flow. The login process, billing, and construction management features are easy to find, easy to use, and helpful. The limitations on Quickbooks restrict users from the ability to view and bill full contracts if broken down, to track and show % complete. Procore is confusing.
Do you think Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management's feature set?
Yes
Did Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management again?
Yes