TrustRadius

ACCELQ vs. Avo Assure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ACCELQ
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
ACCELQ is an agile quality management platform that helps users achieve continuous delivery for web, mobile, manual testing, and APIs. It can be used to write and manage manual test cases for the functionality that may be too fluid for automation.N/A
Avo Assure
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Avo Assure is an intelligent, no-code test automation solution that aims to enable users to deliver high-quality applications and achieve continuous testing. Features are provided by the vendor: Avo Assure enables users to create and execute test cases without writing code. Its no-code capabilitiess help users run end-to-end tests with a few button clicks. It is cross-platform compatible so users can execute test cases for the web, windows, mobile…N/A
Pricing
ACCELQAvo Assure
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ACCELQAvo Assure
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ACCELQAvo Assure
Considered Both Products
ACCELQ

No answer on this topic

Avo Assure
Verified User
Administrator
Chose Avo Assure
The Other tool takes more time for debugging if run in large code.
Best Alternatives
ACCELQAvo Assure
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.7 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ACCELQAvo Assure
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ACCELQAvo Assure
Likelihood to Recommend
ACCELQ
ACCELQ can support multiple technologies such as web, mobile, API, and mainframe. It’s also suited for SAAS solutions such as Salesforce and addresses challenges such as dynamic HTML. It’s easy to set up, and onboarding is easy, and overall lead time is comparatively less. The overall execution results are captured with screenshots, and it’s easy to debug errors. It has integrations with leading cloud-based desktop and mobile farm services such as Saucelabs, browser stack, etc.; ACCELQ is not developer friendly, and hence the overall adoption for a continuous integration scenario is very limited. If you are using a different test management solution, the integration between accelQ and that tool needs ti to be built and hence requires additional development effort, and it’s buggy too.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Avo Automation
The tool is keyword-driven. If you have logic in mind, it is easy to convert it to script using a vast collection of easy-to-understand keywords.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
ACCELQ
  • Scriptless and hence coding is easy.
  • Maintenance of the scripts are easy.
  • Learning curve is small.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Avo Automation
  • Test complex end-to-end business processes spanning web, mobile, SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, desktop and more
  • Well-organized interface
  • Smart scheduling to run tests in parallel and schedule execution during non-business hours.
  • Offers a visual representation of the entire testing component hierarchy with its unique Mindmaps feature and helps define test plans and design test flows with excellent transparency.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
ACCELQ
  • The tool is not developer friendly and hence adoption across developers is low.
  • The tool does not have an admin console to manage the users centrally.
  • Different types of licensing and it’s all user based and hence pricey.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Avo Automation
  • Nothing so far. All inline with my epectations and Industry standards.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ACCELQ
When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building the tool, and hence we did not pick it.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Avo Automation
The Other tool takes more time for debugging if run in large code.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
ACCELQ
  • Overall adoption of an automation tool went up.
  • Migration of existing selenium scripts to ACCELQ was relatively easy and less effort.
  • Lack of overall admin console and hence managing the agents across different execution is difficult.
  • Integration between accelQ and any test management tool can be difficult and buggy in most cases, even though it can be coded.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Avo Automation
  • A lot of time has been saved
  • Many manual jobs have been automated
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots

Avo Assure Screenshots

Screenshot of Leverage 100's of pre-built test cases and reduce your testing time by over 75%.Screenshot of Create Mindmaps to define test plans and design the test flow.