Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Acunetix by Invicti
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AcuSensor from Maltese company Acunetix is application security and testing software.
$4,500
FuzzDB
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
FuzzDB is an open source database introduced by Mozilla developers, supplying attack patterns, predictable resource names, regex patterns for identifying interesting server responses, and documentation resources. It’s most often used testing the security of web applications.N/A
Nikto
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Nikto is an open source fast (not stealthy) vulnerability testing tool that can be used in penetration testing or purple team exercises.N/A
Pricing
Acunetix by InvictiFuzzDBNikto
Editions & Modules
Websites Scanned: 5
4,500
Websites Scanned: 6-10
7,200
Websites Scanned: 11-20
10,800
Websites Scanned: 21-35
22,540
Websites Scanned: 36-50
26,600
Websites Scanned: Over 50
Contact for quote
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Acunetix by InvictiFuzzDBNikto
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Acunetix by InvictiFuzzDBNikto
Considered Multiple Products
Acunetix by Invicti
Chose Acunetix by Invicti
In my opinion Acunetix fares good in DevSecOps pipeline better than Appspider. In terms of vulnerabilities scanning of dynamic applications I liked Rapid7, however we have better ROI with Acunetix. During 6 months of usage I tried to look into cost benefit analysis and could …
Chose Acunetix by Invicti
ZAP is a free tool, and adequate. But it is to that extent less friendly. I would not be as confident of the results and it definitely can't produce reports on par with Acunetix. There would be a lot of legwork on our end if we desired to switch to this tool.
Chose Acunetix by Invicti
Every year, we re-evaluate the tools we are using and licensing. We balance the ever-changing vendor licensing-models, costs, tool features/usability, etc. For the last few years, this has been the best overall commercial tool for our specific use case. However, this is only …
FuzzDB

No answer on this topic

Nikto
Best Alternatives
Acunetix by InvictiFuzzDBNikto
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Acunetix by InvictiFuzzDBNikto
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Acunetix by InvictiFuzzDBNikto
Likelihood to Recommend
Acunetix scales well from a small web development presence like ours to a full-scale enterprise focused on that. The various tools and sensors that provide assurance of the results and can give feedback down to the lines of code in the source are proof of this. Various integrations exist as well. The main thing for us is that it simplifies confirming and remediating potential issues in our code or proving that products we use have issues that we can then take to the vendor for correction.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Nikto is well suited for scanning web server-related vulnerabilities for small and medium enterprises. We can utilise it for checking server default files and security misconfigurations. It is not suited well for some users because it is CLI based tool and not a GUI based. Also, community and OEM support are not available for this tool.
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration of tool with different IDE is great
  • Easy to scan code and identify vulnerabilities
  • Dashboard is easy to customise
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • Well known tool
  • Source code available
  • Wweb server vulnerability scanner
Read full review
Cons
  • Does not support multiple endpoints well (e.g. apps and services that do not reside at the same URL).
  • Has authentication problems with modern enterprise apps which involve a lot of redirects to unrelated endpoints, federated IDs, SSO, etc. This is related to the first point.
  • The vulnerability detection capability is not as robust as Burp Suite Pro + extensions, Metasploit + auxiliary modules, Nmap + scripts, etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • Can be made GUI based for ease of users
  • User community should be there
  • Development and support should be available
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In my opinion Acunetix fares good in DevSecOps pipeline better than Appspider. In terms of vulnerabilities scanning of dynamic applications I liked Rapid7, however we have better ROI with Acunetix. During 6 months of usage I tried to look into cost benefit analysis and could easily pick Acunetix and in terms of dashboards also I am impressed
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Saved money compared to other commercial scanners, especially over the long run.
  • Scan speed seems to be pretty good compared to some of the bulkier commercial products out there. However, that largely has to do with proper configuration.
  • A downside is that is requires a bit of extra work just to get it set up to scan APIs, web services, etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • Improved security posture of organisation.
  • Improved in regulatory and corporate compliance.
  • Easy to use result in adaptation of this tool by business users.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Acunetix by Invicti Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardScreenshot of FilteringScreenshot of scan results