Akamai API Gateway vs. Kong Konnect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Akamai API Gateway
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Akamai offers their API Gateway, touting easy control and access to enterprise applications via their services.N/A
Kong Konnect
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Kong Inc. is a cloud connectivity company headquartered in San Francisco. They are the creator and primary supporter of Kong, the open-source Microservice API gateway, and offer Kong Konnect, an enterprise-tier platform that delivers connectivity and visibility for services in multi-cloud environments.
$250
per month
Pricing
Akamai API GatewayKong Konnect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Plus
$250
Service/Month
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Akamai API GatewayKong Konnect
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Akamai API GatewayKong Konnect
Features
Akamai API GatewayKong Konnect
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Akamai API Gateway
7.7
1 Ratings
9% below category average
Kong Konnect
-
Ratings
API access control8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Akamai API GatewayKong Konnect
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.8 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Akamai API GatewayKong Konnect
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Akamai API GatewayKong Konnect
Likelihood to Recommend
Akamai
It is really helpful for managing [the] scaling of systems with need and utilizing resources when needed. Also, DevOps support for deployment plans is quite useful when deploying applications. Monitoring systems with graphQL and utilizing them in APIs is quite helpful when used in Microservices systems to identify system capabilities and user utilization of applications.
Read full review
Kong, Inc
Using Kong [Konnect]'s declarative settings, a user may control traffic, automate deployment, and maintain container-based software after it's deployed. In addition, it handles the whole lifecycle of service management. Installation, management, and operation of Kong [Konnects]'s cloud-native connection runtimes may be performed in any cloud or Kubernetes provider environment, as well as on-premises environments. In order to optimise their services and transactions, users may keep track of their services and transactions in real-time via real-time monitoring.
Read full review
Pros
Akamai
  • Graphically representation in GraphQL
  • Scaling system
  • DevOps management
Read full review
Kong, Inc
  • Application orchestration
  • Error tracing
  • Analyzing traffic
  • Load balancing
Read full review
Cons
Akamai
  • Quota enforcement can be simplified
  • Caching mechanism for API with akamai can be improved
  • Gateway configuration can be simplified as details are not much elaborate
Read full review
Kong, Inc
  • Community support
  • Sample projects for easy integration
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Akamai
Akamai [API Gateway] helps better in terms of representation of graphQL and its consumption in monitoring system making a package for deployment speed with monitoring and scaling application with all services and utilizing most of a system without much knowledge of other aspects. Also, [a] user-friendly system helps people to handle [the] system with necessary options
Read full review
Kong, Inc
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Akamai
  • Decrease in time required for deployment and monitoring by significant amount causing less support resources needed
  • Scaling applications on month-end at high usage time has reduced TAT time for issues and no of issues occurring
  • Quota enforcement has allowed [managing] multiple systems and their needs in respective stakeholders hands and reduced infra teams involvement in [the] management of reoccurring problems
Read full review
Kong, Inc
  • Increased application efficiency
  • Reduced system downtown
  • Significantly improved error resolution
Read full review
ScreenShots