Amazon CodeGuru vs. Coverity Static Analysis (SAST)

Amazon CodeGuru can be really useful to any company that develops applications and make it possible to integrate with your cloud infrastructure (AWS).In general, we can notice that the codes have been more clean and trustable.

Incentivized

Best suits for large scale and dynamic development environment. It may be best tool if you want to release your apps with less TAT. However if you have a CRM tool which is COTS product it can offer little help. Even then you should be familiar with what features of Coverity Static Analysis (SAST) are helpful for your development environment

Incentivized

• It can provide security scanning dashboard
• Help detect vulnerabilities and recommend remediation
• Integration of devsecops helps speed up release cycles

Incentivized

• They could have more suggestions but it's part of the maturation process

Incentivized

• Coverage of integration with other security tools can be improved
• Customisation of dashboard to enable customer choice of tracking
• Showcase devsecops progressive tasks from SLA and violation from code scanner perspective

Incentivized

Coverity Static Analysis (SAST) has wide coverage in terms of Owasp Top 10 vulnerabilities, various types of languages, backward integration. While other tools offer similar experience of code scanning, coverity helps in pointed recommendations for quick closure of vulnerabilities. The historical analysis of vulnerabilities is a good value add in understanding which type of code and which language is better in improving cyber security maturity.

Incentivized

• We have been much more productive and producing codes with less bugs and more trustable

Incentivized

• Helped reduce efforts of development team avoiding rework
• Increased security maturity
• Increased efficiency of the teams

Incentivized