Likelihood to Recommend Amazon AMIs has been very useful for the quick setup and implementation of deep learning for data analysis which is something I have used the service for in my own research. We commonly use the service to enable students to run intensive deep learning algorithms for their assessments. This service works well in this scenario as it allows students to quickly set up a suitable environment and get started with little hassle. If you are looking to run simple, surface level deep learning algorithms (kind of contradictory statement I know) then AMI is more complicated than most will need. When it comes to teaching the basics of Machine Learning, this kind of system is unnecessary and there are other alternatives which can be used. That being said this service is a must if you are looking to run complex deep learning via the cloud.
Read full review TensorFlow is great for most deep learning purposes. This is especially true in two domains: 1. Computer vision: image classification, object detection and image generation via generative adversarial networks 2. Natural language processing: text classification and generation. The good community support often means that a lot of off-the-shelf models can be used to prove a concept or test an idea quickly. That, and Google's promotion of Colab means that ideas can be shared quite freely. Training, visualizing and debugging models is very easy in TensorFlow, compared to other platforms (especially the good old Caffe days). In terms of productionizing, it's a bit of a mixed bag. In our case, most of our feature building is performed via Apache Spark. This means having to convert Parquet (columnar optimized) files to a TensorFlow friendly format i.e., protobufs. The lack of good JVM bindings mean that our projects end up being a mix of Python and Scala. This makes it hard to reuse some of the tooling and support we wrote in Scala. This is where MXNet shines better (though its Scala API could do with more work).
Read full review Pros Setting up environment Support for different types of machines Perfect for Machine Learning / Deep Learning use cases Nvidia / Cuda / Conda support easily Read full review A vast library of functions for all kinds of tasks - Text, Images, Tabular, Video etc. Amazing community helps developers obtain knowledge faster and get unblocked in this active development space. Integration of high-level libraries like Keras and Estimators make it really simple for a beginner to get started with neural network based models. Read full review Cons Some aspects of the User Interface are quite confusing and activating packages can be a bit convoluted It can be a bit confusing to switch between frameworks for novice users Read full review RNNs are still a bit lacking, compared to Theano. Cannot handle sequence inputs Theano is perhaps a bit faster and eats up less memory than TensorFlow on a given GPU, perhaps due to element-wise ops. Tensorflow wins for multi-GPU and “compilation” time. Read full review Usability Support of multiple components and ease of development.
Read full review Support Rating Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
Read full review Implementation Rating Use of cloud for better execution power is recommended.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Both of these services provide similar functionality and from my experience both are top class services which cover most of your needs. I think ultimately it comes down to what you need each service for. For example Amazon DL AMIs allows for clustering by default meaning I am able to run several clustering algorithms without a problem whereas IBM Watson Studio doesn't provide this functionality. They both provide a wide range of default packages such as Amazon providing caffe-2 and IBM providing sci-kitlearn. My main point is that both are very good services which have very similar functionality, you just need to think about the costs, suitability of features and integration with other services you are using.
Read full review Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features,
Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, for sure TensorFlow is the right choice
Read full review Return on Investment Saves a lot of Infra Costs Saves a lot of time in handling environment issues Easy to start a new instance Read full review Learning is s bit difficult takes lot of time. Developing or implementing the whole neural network is time consuming with this, as you have to write everything. Once you have learned this, it make your job very easy of getting the good result. Read full review ScreenShots