Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) vs. Amazon Lightsail
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | The Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. | $0.04 per GB |
Amazon Lightsail | Score9.6 out of 10 | N/A | Amazon Lightsail is a virtual private server (VPS) designed to present an easy-to-use cloud platform that offers everything needed to build an application or website, plus a cost-effective, monthly plan. | $3.50 per month |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Amazon Lightsail | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no minimum fee or setup charge. You pay only for the storage you use, for read and write access to data stored in Infrequent Access storage classes, and for any provisioned throughput. Amazon EFS offers four storage classes: two standard storage classes, including Amazon EFS Standard and Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA), and two One Zone storage classes, including Amazon EFS One Zone and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Amazon Lightsail | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 67% Would buy again 4 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 83% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 4 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Amazon Lightsail | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Amazon Lightsail | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Amazon Lightsail | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.5 | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Amazon Lightsail | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



