Amazon SageMaker vs. Pytorch

Amazon SageMaker is a great tool for developing machine learning models that take more effort than just point-and-click type of analyses. The software works well with the other tools in the Amazon ecosystem, so if you use Amazon Web Services or are thinking about it, SageMaker would be a great addition. SageMaker is great for consumer insights, predictive analytics, and looking for gems of insight in the massive amounts of data we create. SageMaker is less suitable for analysts who do generally "small" data analyses, and "small" data analyses in today's world can be billions of records.

Incentivized

They have created Pytorch Lightening on top of Pytorch to make the life of Data Scientists easy so that they can use complex models they need with just a few lines of code, so it's becoming popular. As compared to TensorFlow(Keras), where we can create custom neural networks by just adding layers, it's slightly complicated in Pytorch.

Incentivized

• Provides enough freedom for experienced data scientists and also for those who just need things done without going much deeper into building models.
• Customization and easy to alter and change.
• If you already are an Amazon user, you do not need to transition over to another software.

Incentivized

• Provides Benchmark datasets to test your custom algorithm
• Provides with a lot of pre-coded neural net components to use for your flow
• Gives a framework to write really abstract code.

Incentivized

• The UI can be eased up a bit for use by business analysts and non technical users
• For huge amount of data pull from legacy solutions, the platform lags a bit
• Considering ML is an emerging topic and would be used by most of the organizations in future, the pipeline integrations can be optimized

Incentivized

• Distributed data parallel still seems to be complicated
• Support for easy deployment to servers
• Torchvision to have support for latest models with pertained weights

Incentivized

Amazon SageMaker comes with other supportive services like S3, SQS, and a vast variety of servers on EC2. It's very comfortable to manage the process and also support the end application by one click hosting option. Also, it charges on the base of what you use and how long you use it, so it becomes less costly compared to others.

Incentivized

As I described in previous statements, Pytorch is much better suited than TensorFlow from a software development look. This Pythonic idea was then taken and repeated by all the other frameworks. You can get to better performance models by better understanding the deep learning model code, so I think the choice of Pytorch is easy and simple.

Incentivized

• We have been able to deliver data products more rapidly because we spend less time building data pipelines and model servers.
• We can prototype more rapidly because it is easy to configure notebooks to access AWS resources.
• For our use-cases, serving models is less expensive with SageMaker than bespoke servers.

Incentivized

• I'd estimate I can build a model 50% faster on pytorch vs other frameworks

Incentivized