TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) vs. IBM Astra Streaming

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon SQS

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Web Services (AWS) Provides the Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS), a managed message queue service which supports the safe decoupling and distribution of different components in a cloud infrastructure and cloud applications.

    $0

    per GB

    IBM Astra Streaming

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ANow from IBM, Astra Streaming is a serverless data streaming and event stream processing service integrated in the Astra Portal and powered by Apache Pulsar™.N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra Streaming
    Editions & Modules
    All Data Transfer In
    $0.00
    per GB
    Standard Queue
    $0.00000004
    per request
    FIFO Queue
    $0.00000005
    per request
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra Streaming
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra Streaming
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra Streaming
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.1
    (7 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon SQSIBM Astra Streaming
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    If you are looking to build something that just requires a simple queue service (as the name implies) this is great for it. You might look elsewhere though if you get into more complicated needs. This is also very well suited if you are already using other services with AWS and intend to fully build whatever you are building in AWS. If you are looking for a mixed environment -- SQS is not for you
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    DataStax Enterprise is a state-of-the-art data management platform that manages our own data across web, mobile, and IoT applications. It is a hybrid cloud-based solution that enables us to meet the availability and performance requirements of web, IoT and mobile platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • It provides an always-available serverless queue for workflows or mission-critical processes.
    • Is extremely low cost and overall costs to our environments have been negligible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Easy to operate and save man hours
    • Easy installation and configuration
    • Mature and scalable data warehouse, well supported
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Almost all of the functionality has been covered by SQS, but they could improve the throughput time.
    • Also, they could provide built-in Cloud Watch, so that we can easily configure it without any external efforts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Their solution is expensive compared to other resolutions, however you get what you pay for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    Online blogging and documentation for SQS is great. There are many examples of implementing it and if you look hard enough, more than likely there are examples that meet the exact case with which you are working
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    The most comparable products are RabbitMQ, and perhaps ActiveMQ. Until recently, AWS did not offer a managed ActiveMQ product. Running RabbitMQ will never be to my team's competitive advantage; we wanted a managed service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive impact - time allocation towards different features
    • Negative impact - too many resources dedicated towards debugging
    • Positive impact - less manual labor during testing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • In my personal opinion, I can mention that this product has enormous positive points because it has worked really well for us in our organization in a very positive way, for which we ourselves feel quite comfortable with this product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots