TrustRadius

Apache Archiva vs. Pulp

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Archiva
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Apache Archiva is a software repository management solution.N/A
Pulp
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Pulp is an open source platform for managing repositories of software packages and making them available to a large number of consumers. Pulp can locally mirror all or part of a repository, host software packages in repositories, and manage many types of content from multiple sources in one place. Pulp is a Red Hat Community Project.N/A
Pricing
Apache ArchivaPulp
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache ArchivaPulp
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache ArchivaPulp
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Apache ArchivaPulp
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache ArchivaPulp
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache ArchivaPulp
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Well suited for small organizations to medium-sized teams/organizations. Apache Archiva is well suited for:
  • It acts as a central repository/proxy of the artifacts generated and used by the teams.
  • It provides control on which open source repositories can be utilized by the team.
  • Saves network bandwidth by reducing outbound traffic.
Apache Archiva is less appropriate for organizations where immediate support/bug resolutions are required.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Open Source
I understand that this tool may not be for everyone, but it served its purpose perfectly for us. It allows us to safely change to older repositories in case we need to roll back any changes. It has definitely reduced operational costs for us due to allowing us to safely manage our own packages without relying solely on external providers, which are not always reliable. However, it's worth mentioning that the setup/maintenance can be a little bit fiddly for some users. There's a learning curve here, but, to us, it was totally worth it.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • It's an open source project and therefore saves cost.
  • It allows exchange of artifacts/libraries between different teams.
  • It allows managing internal and external repositories with ease.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Cons
Apache
  • Muti-tenancy was hard to achieve.
  • UI can be improved. Its seems bit dated.
  • It is a bit tricky to setup.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apache
  • Apache Archiva is a great choice for organizations with a limited budget.
  • Alternatives are expensive to acquire Archiva comes offers REST API(s) which allows the creation of customized UI.
  • With Apache Archiva, it is easy to manage the remote proxy repositories.
  • RBAC helps with managing user access to the repository.
  • Configuration can be achieved using UI and stored in archiva.xml.
  • Backup of configuration is quite simple.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Apache
  • The impact of Apache Archiva on ROI has been positive. Since it is open source. It is free.
  • It has allowed teams to store artifacts centrally, thus leading to a reduced need for multiple servers
  • Security audits can be easily performed on the artifacts.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots