Apache Camel vs. Elevate EDI

Elevate EDI

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Apache Camel	Score 7.5 out of 10	N/A	Apache Camel is an open source integration platform.	N/A
Elevate EDI	Score 0.0 out of 10	Small Businesses (1-50 employees)	Elevate is a fully managed Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) software application designed for small businesses that require reliable document exchange without employing an in-house EDI expert. The system is designed for suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, third-party logistics (3PL) providers, and growing brands that must satisfy retailer, marketplace, logistics, or trading partner EDI specifications without coordinating the technical complexity internally. For…	$50 per month

Pricing

Apache Camel

Elevate EDI

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Starting Price for 1 Trading Partner Setup: $750 one time + $50 per month
1 Trading Partner Setup + ERP Integration with API connection: $750 one time + $50 per month + $5000 one-time API Integration + $250/month
1 Trading Partner + File-based ERP Integration + GS1-128 Labels/Packing Slips Setup: $750 one time fee + $50/month + $2000 one time for File-based integration Setup + $100/month
1 Trading Partner + GS1-128 Labels/Packing Slips + ERP (API) Integration: $750 on-time fee + $50/month + $250 one time + $5000 one-time API Integration fee + $250/month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Apache Camel	Elevate EDI
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

$750 one-time fee

Additional Details

—

1 Trading Partner Setup starts at $750 with a one-time fee for setup and implementation + $50/month platform fee. The pricing involves: 1 Trading Partner Setup and Onboarding Trading Partner Testing & Certification Support Ongoing Compliance Updates Monitoring & Issue Resolution Partner Maintenance & Human Support

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Apache Camel	Elevate EDI

Best Alternatives
	Apache Camel	Elevate EDI
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	Boomi Score 7.7 out of 10	Boomi Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Boomi Score 7.7 out of 10	Boomi Score 7.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Apache Camel	Elevate EDI
Likelihood to Recommend	7.9 (11 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Apache Camel	Elevate EDI
Likelihood to Recommend	Apache Message brokering across different systems, with transactionality and the ability to have fine tuned control over what happens using Java (or other languages), instead of a heavy, proprietary languages. One situation that it doesn't fit very well (as far as I have experienced) is when your workflow requires significant data mapping. While possible when using Java tooling, some other visual data mapping tools in other integration frameworks are easier to work with. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	EDI SUPPORT LLC No answers on this topic
Pros	Apache Camel has an easy learning curve. It is fairly well documented and there are about 5-6 books on Camel. There is a large user group and blogs devoted to all things Camel and the developers of Camel provide quick answers and have also been very quick to patch Camel, when bugs are reported. Camel integrates well with well known frameworks like Spring, and other middleware products like Apache Karaf and Servicemix. There are over 150 components for the Camel framework that help integrate with diverse software platforms. Camel is also good for creating microservices. Incentivized SS Surjit Sen Senior Software Consultant at Randstad Read full review	EDI SUPPORT LLC No answers on this topic
Cons	Apache didn't work well when our developers tried to transform heavy data sets Apache Camel's whole logic is based on java so team needs to have a great skill set in java if there are a handful of workflows then Apache Camel's full potential can't be realized Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	EDI SUPPORT LLC No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Apache If you are looking for a Java-based open source low cost equivalent to webMethods or Azure Logic Apps, Apache Camel is an excellent choice as it is mature and widely deployed, and included in many vendored Java application servers too such as Redhat JBoss EAP. Apache Camel is lacking on the GUI tooling side compared to commercial products such as webMethods or Azure Logic Apps. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	EDI SUPPORT LLC No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Apache Very fast time to market in that so many components are available to use immediately. Error handling mechanisms and patterns of practice are robust and easy to use which in turn has made our application more robust from the start, so fewer bugs. However, testing and debugging routes is more challenging than working is standard Java so that takes more time (less time than writing the components from scratch). Most people don't know Camel coming in and many junior developers find it overwhelming and are not enthusiastic to learn it. So finding people that want to develop/maintain it is a challenge. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	EDI SUPPORT LLC No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		Elevate EDI Screenshots