Apache Flink vs. Confluent

In well-suited scenarios, I would recommend using Apache Flink when you need to perform real-time analytics on streaming data, such as monitoring user activities, analyzing IoT device data, or processing financial transactions in real-time. It is also a good choice in scenarios where fault tolerance and consistency are crucial. I would not recommend it for simple batch processing pipelines or for teams that aren't experienced, as it might be overkill, and the steep learning curve may not justify the investment.

Incentivized

If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.

Incentivized

• Low latency Stream Processing, enabling real-time analytics
• Scalability, due its great parallel capabilities
• Stateful Processing, providing several built-in fault tolerance systems
• Flexibility, supporting both batch and stream processing

Incentivized

• Products work great.
• Training is available.
• Customer support is good.

Incentivized

• Python/SQL API, since both are relatively new, still misses a few features in comparison with the Java/Scala option
• Steep Learning Curve, it's documentation could be improved to something more user-friendly, and it could also discuss more theoretical concepts than just coding
• Community smaller than other frameworks

Incentivized

• Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP

Incentivized

The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.

Incentivized

Apache Spark is more user-friendly and features higher-level APIs. However, it was initially built for batch processing and only more recently gained streaming capabilities. In contrast, Apache Flink processes streaming data natively. Therefore, in terms of low latency and fault tolerance, Apache Flink takes the lead. However, Spark has a larger community and a decidedly lower learning curve.

Incentivized

For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.

Incentivized

• Allowed for real-time data recovery, adding significant value to the busines
• Enabled us to create new internal tools that we couldn't find in the market, becoming a strategic asset for the business
• Enhanced the overall technical capability of the team

Incentivized

• It enables us to develop event driven application.
• It increases our ability to handle streaming data.
• It reduces latency of communication.

Incentivized