TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Apache Log4j vs. IBM Security QRadar Log Insights

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Log4j

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ALog4j is a Java-based logging utility from the Apache Foundation, available free and open source.N/A

    IBM Security QRadar Log Insights

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AIBM Security® QRadar® Log Insights helps users gain complete over a company's growing digital footprint. It is designed to address security observability needs with simple data ingestion, rapid search and visualizations. QRadar Log Insights extracts, investigates and pull sdata from anywhere, and it can perform multiple, concurrent searches on large data subsets in seconds. Its interactive dashboards and analytics help users to detect, investigate and plan action against threats faster.N/A
    Pricing
    Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
    Small Businesses
    SolarWinds Papertrail
    Score8.9 out of 10
    SolarWinds Papertrail
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server
    Score8.1 out of 10
    SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SolarWinds Loggly
    Score7.7 out of 10
    SolarWinds Loggly
    Score7.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Log4jIBM Security QRadar Log Insights
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    There is multiple reasons. All types are logging messages support not only string msg. We can use parametrized variables for logging Support advance filter for logging like (Data, Markers, Regular Expression) Support Plugin Architecture (We just use the dependency and Layout configuration with minimal config, and this will start to work) Integration support with application server Could enable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Apache
    • Integration with java.
    • Configure logging levels.
    • Customize logging contents.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Apache
    • Fixed the vulnerability which is reported which affect many big brand.
    • There should be security check to check all vulnerability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    The ability to customize logging levels and manage log files is superior to other products we have looked at; due to this we selected to go with log4j.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Good logging tools we can integrate with minimal resource consumption.
    • Ease of understanding.
    • Plugin play component Architecture.
    • Advance filter support can be used to filter all types of logs and events, which can be further analyzed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots