Apache Pulsar vs. IBM Integration Bus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Pulsar
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Apache Pulsar is a cloud-native, distributed messaging and streaming platform originally created at Yahoo! and now an Apache Software Foundation project. It is free and open source, available under the Apache License, version 2.0.N/A
IBM Integration Bus
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
IBM Integration Bus, replacing the former WebSphere Message Broker, is used to connect applications together, regardless of the message formats or protocols that they support. This connectivity helps to ensure diverse applications can interact and exchange data with other applications in a flexible, dynamic, and extensible infrastructure.N/A
Pricing
Apache PulsarIBM Integration Bus
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache PulsarIBM Integration Bus
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache PulsarIBM Integration Bus
Best Alternatives
Apache PulsarIBM Integration Bus
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Confluent
Confluent
Score 9.2 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.3 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache PulsarIBM Integration Bus
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache PulsarIBM Integration Bus
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
Routing, protocol transformation, message transformation and service aggregation are very well performed by WebSphere Message Broker (WMB). It is not very suitable for integration with databases.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Graphical data mapper
  • Support for different programming languages
  • Integration with MQ
  • Support for different parsers
Read full review
Cons
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Logging
  • Debugging
  • Code quality tools
  • Feature specific installation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
Websphere message broker supports a lot more protocols than any other similar tool.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • It helped us in improving the speed to market for our services/APIs.
  • Learning curve is quite long
Read full review
ScreenShots