TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Appcelerator (discontinued)

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AAppcelerator was a mobile app development platform acquired by Axway in 2016. It has been discontinued.N/A

    Azure App Service

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AThe Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby.

    $9.49

    per month

    Pricing
    Appcelerator (discontinued)Azure App Service
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Shared Environment for dev/test
    $9.49
    per month
    Basic Dedicated environment for dev/test
    $54.75
    per month
    Standard Run production workloads
    $73
    per month
    Premium Enhanced performance and scale
    $146
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Appcelerator (discontinued)Azure App Service
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Free and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Appcelerator (discontinued)Azure App Service
    Considered Both Products
    Discontinued Products
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    82%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Features
    Appcelerator (discontinued)Azure App Service
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Appcelerator (discontinued) and Azure App Service
    Feature
    Appcelerator (discontinued)
    -
    Ratings
    Azure App Service
    6.2
    7 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings7.37 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings6.97 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.37 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings6.35 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings7.46 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings5.86 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings6.27 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings5.96 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings6.17 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings4.26 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings4.76 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Appcelerator (discontinued)Azure App Service
    Small Businesses
    Swiftify
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Xamarin
    Score6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Swiftify
    Score9 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Appcelerator (discontinued)Azure App Service
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.9
    (11 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.5
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Appcelerator (discontinued)Azure App Service
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Discontinued Products
    I do not think I can recommend Appcelerator at this point due to the issues with Appcelerator studio, lack of good debugging support, lack of thorough documentation and forums and the additional cost overhead of licenses. The pros are just that it allows for cross-platform development. However, Cordova does a much better job of it and excels at places where Appcelerator currently struggles
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    You may easily deploy your apps to Azure App Service if they were written in Visual Studio IDE (typically.NET applications). With a few clicks of the mouse, you may already deploy your application to a remote server using the Visual Studio IDE. As a result of the portal's bulk and complexity, I propose Heroku for less-experienced developers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Discontinued Products
    • Adds structure to your code through Alloy framework.
    • Easy to integrate with iOS SDK and to build and run iOS apps.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Extremely easy to deploy and update from Visual Studio
    • It integrates seamlessly with other Azure PaaS resources
    • It has an in-depth integration with AppInsights, so you can understand errors and their root cause easily.
    • Easy to create and delete, what is not the same case in a IaaS resource
    • It escalates based on CPU workload and some other resource variables.
    • Configuration changes are almost immediate
    • Offers an excellent abstraction from hardware backend of the platform
    • That's updated very often, saving time and the risk of a self-performed update over a IaaS
    • That's really easy to develop for Web Apps
    • It supports Function Apps and Web Apps into the same "cost black box"
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Discontinued Products
    • It is very hard to debug your code. Breakpoints never worked for us even with the latest Appcelerator Studio and we had to rely on log statements to debug.
    • There is a need to purchase licenses from Appcelerator to run the code on a device or for creating iOS distribution builds. This is an additional cost when you have already paid for Apple developer program for precisely these things.
    • If things are broken due to lack to support between Appcelerator and a new iOS version, you pretty much have to rely on a new version release from Appcelerator for the issue to be fixed.
    • It is difficult to create enterprise distribution builds where the distribution certificate is owned by your organization's team and you only have a development certificate for the same.
    • The forums on developer.appcelerator.com are seldom helpful. It is hard to find solutions for issues even on other forums like stack overflow.
    • Documentation needs to be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Jumps between resource sizes can get expensive
    • You may wind up putting a lot of eggs in one basket--not necessarily a con but something to keep in mind (most of your data will likely be managed and processed through Microsoft products/services if you fully commit to Azure App Service).
    • Learning new technology. If you're moving from on-premises to Azure App Service (or any cloud solutions), you'll likely have to rethink how things are done to achieve the same end results (and/or resources may become expensive quickly).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I have given this rating because Azure App Service performs very well in terms of speed, reliability, and reducing overhead, and improves overall team productivity, with a little scope for improvement in complex testing scenarios and configurations, scalability concerns in a large setup, and similar tracking and audit needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Microsoft has always been known for providing a high standard in terms of customer support and Azure App Service (and as a matter of fact the whole Azure Platform) is no exception. Azure App Service never caused us any issues and we only contacted their customer support for questions regarding server locations and pricing. I feel pretty satisfied with how they treat their customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Discontinued Products
    Appcelerator makes you write a structured code whereas Cordova just packages your code and you are free to structure it. Appcelerator bridges your javascript code with native code and that would make it run faster than javascript code in Cordova apps. However, with recent mobile browsers, you would hardly notice any performance deterioration with Cordova apps. Appcelerator struggles with issues related to its IDE, debugging, documentation and forums and additional costs. Cordova makes it much more simpler to develop cross-platform apps with better developer support, debugging support, documentation and forums minus the additional costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    When we chose it, we did so because of its integration with Microsoft applications; now we need to integrate with AI, and Azure doesn't offer a good integration. That is the main reason to change it. It is still great to develop Windows- and Microsoft-based applications, but if we need to integrate with AI, Google wins by far.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Discontinued Products
    • We were able to build and deploy a mobile app with Appcelerator. However, the platform still has issues and does not cover our needs as much as some of its competitor like cordova does.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Deployment of ASP.NET apps at the organization has been sped up.
    • An option to offer access to the version control system on a third platform so that we could easily deploy our apps.
    • Because of Azure App Service's scalability capabilities, the costs of running the services are kept to a minimum. As a result, we may save hundreds of dollars each month compared to the expenses of traditional servers by using fewer resources during slack periods.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots