Appium vs. epuBear SDK

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appium
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
epuBear SDK
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
EPUBear SDK is a cross-platform EPUB reader software development kit for teams building custom ebook reading applications. It provides the core components needed to open, unpack, parse, and render EPUB files inside web, mobile, and desktop products. The SDK is designed for software companies, digital publishers, EdTech providers, content platforms, and digital library projects that need reliable EPUB reading functionality without developing a reader engine from scratch. Key…
$899
one-time fee
Pricing
AppiumepuBear SDK
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Android or iOS (1 year of support)
$ 899
one-time fee
MAUI or Flutter (1 year of support)
$ 1398
one-time fee
Android or iOS (2 years of support)
$ 1599
one-time fee
MAUI or Flutter (2 years of support)
$ 1999
one-time fee
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppiumepuBear SDK
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppiumepuBear SDK
User Ratings
AppiumepuBear SDK
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppiumepuBear SDK
Likelihood to Recommend
JS Foundation
1. It's open source which supports range of languages, operating systems and languages. Well suited for Android and IOS mobile automation. Supports all kinds of apps, which makes it flexible and robust mobile testing tool 2. It is less appropriate where we need intercept network call to verify the API calls. Extensive coding experience is required to work Appium
Read full review
SCAND
No answers on this topic
Pros
JS Foundation
  • It uses WebDriver API so it makes it easy to use for former web test automation engineers.
  • It can be managed via the command line via an extensive set of parameters.
  • It handles implicit waits at the server side that is especially valuable in distributed infrastructure.
Read full review
SCAND
No answers on this topic
Cons
JS Foundation
  • Element browser sometimes is unreliable and has sporadic fails.
  • Appium running is a bit slow, compared to tests written with Appium and with Espresso or XCTest.
Read full review
SCAND
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
JS Foundation
I am rating 10/10 because Appium can use with multiple programming languages with multiple Test engines. Also, it works for both Android and iOS.
Read full review
SCAND
No answers on this topic
Usability
JS Foundation
I would like to give 9/10 rating to Appium because of it can easily integrate with popular frameworks and CI/CD tools, as well as it is reliable, flexible and easy to use. The setup can bit complex in initial step, but once on configured it's very easy to use and enables stable and scalable mobile automation for real and cloud devices.
Read full review
SCAND
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
JS Foundation
If you're an Apple developer, you use Xcode. It's practically a forced necessity. For system testing though, it doesn't have to be. You can have your development team focus on unit and integration tests in their platform and another team automate acceptance tests with a language they are more familiar with.
Read full review
SCAND
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
JS Foundation
  • Appium is open source, so it's free. That's budget friendly right there.
  • The ability to write mobile automation tests has saved considerable time for our manual test team, but that is true with most automation tests.
  • We use Sauce Labs with our other automation, but Appium works great with Sauce Labs, as well, if I needed to run on emulators and simulators.
Read full review
SCAND
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

epuBear SDK Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of