Appium vs. MOZARK

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appium
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
MOZARK
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
MOZARK is an App Experience Testing Platform that lets users perform integrated experience, functional, and performance testing. The solution helps users build apps that engage your customers and drive revenue. The platform is powered by following products: App Experience: Even small lags in an app can lead to abandonments. Users can monitor an app’s performance in real-time to detect and fix customer issues pro-actively. App…N/A
Pricing
AppiumMOZARK
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppiumMOZARK
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
AppiumMOZARK
Small Businesses
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppiumMOZARK
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(9 ratings)
6.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppiumMOZARK
Likelihood to Recommend
JS Foundation
1. It's open source which supports range of languages, operating systems and languages. Well suited for Android and IOS mobile automation. Supports all kinds of apps, which makes it flexible and robust mobile testing tool 2. It is less appropriate where we need intercept network call to verify the API calls. Extensive coding experience is required to work Appium
Read full review
MOZARK Pte.
It is well suited for small-scale applications and freelance developers. It has in-built performance measuring criteria that give good insights about the application use. Overall it is good but it does need improvements in performance measuring metrics and more flexibility in reporting analytics for the application.
Read full review
Pros
JS Foundation
  • It uses WebDriver API so it makes it easy to use for former web test automation engineers.
  • It can be managed via the command line via an extensive set of parameters.
  • It handles implicit waits at the server side that is especially valuable in distributed infrastructure.
Read full review
MOZARK Pte.
  • Dashboard for application performance report and analysis
  • Support for integration with versioning tools like Git helps to quickly move the fixes and test the application in real-time
  • Realtime monitoring gives details about how the application will perform under different loads
Read full review
Cons
JS Foundation
  • Element browser sometimes is unreliable and has sporadic fails.
  • Appium running is a bit slow, compared to tests written with Appium and with Espresso or XCTest.
Read full review
MOZARK Pte.
  • Documentation needs improvement
  • No 24/7 customer support
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
JS Foundation
If you're an Apple developer, you use Xcode. It's practically a forced necessity. For system testing though, it doesn't have to be. You can have your development team focus on unit and integration tests in their platform and another team automate acceptance tests with a language they are more familiar with.
Read full review
MOZARK Pte.
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
JS Foundation
  • Appium is open source, so it's free. That's budget friendly right there.
  • The ability to write mobile automation tests has saved considerable time for our manual test team, but that is true with most automation tests.
  • We use Sauce Labs with our other automation, but Appium works great with Sauce Labs, as well, if I needed to run on emulators and simulators.
Read full review
MOZARK Pte.
  • Easy to use interface
  • Does not require in-depth training or knowledge to start and work with the tool
Read full review
ScreenShots

MOZARK Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of