Arduino vs. Dryad

Excellent for teaching - learning and small projects of automation, robotics, domotics in industry.It has a large development community and being a free software is widely recognized and is constantly evolving.Not very suitable for scenarios where wifi connectivity is needed, in order to make use of it, it is necessary to purchase additional products.

Incentivized

Dryad is well suited for situations where you are lacking data and or on the lookout for more interesting datasets to work with. It is also easy to read about how the authors collected the data and even provides a link to email them in case you need more information.

Incentivized

• Easy interfacing with other microcontrollers
• Your IDE is versatile for programming other types of microcontrollers.

Incentivized

• Data curation
• Easy to use website
• Data in any format

Incentivized

• Arduino should implement wifi communication on most of its development boards.
• Extend your protection against electromagnetic noise

Incentivized

• More incentives for people to contribute data
• More promotion of the platform so people know about it
• Expand data categories

Incentivized

Arduino has its own IDE which allows the programming of its development kits to be done quickly and easily, compared to others.

Incentivized

The website isn't as clean as that for Dryad and there seems to be less support for the end-user. However, it appears that they also have a large number of data repositories and have backing from many well-known universities. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and likability.

Incentivized

• Positive impact on teaching processes, students find their development cards attractive.
• In projects where fast implementation is necessary, it is the best option.

Incentivized

• 35% time saved when it comes to cleaning
• Obviate the need for purchasing data
• Do not need to hire people to collect data

Incentivized