Aspose.Total vs. Syncfusion Essential Studio vs. Temenos Quantum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aspose.Total
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Aspose.Total is a file format manipulation solution, providing a set of document processing solution without any other software installation and dependencies. Its on-premise .NET APIs to manipulate multiple document formats within Windows, Web, iOS & Android based applications. And Java-based platform APIs to create, modify, render or parse Microsoft Word files, Web, Text and OpenOffice documents directly within applications. And users can create, load, manipulate, or convert different document…N/A
Syncfusion Essential Studio
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Since 2002, Essential Studio® has supported the development of software applications across industries and economic sectors, in both public and private enterprises.
$0
*The Syncfusion Community License includes free access to all 1,700+ controls and is available to companies and individuals with less than $1 million USD in annual gross revenue, 5 or fewer developers, and 10 or fewer total employees. Note: An entity or organization may not have ever received more than $3,000,000 USD in capital from an outside source, such as private equity or venture capital, in order to be eligible for the Community License.
Temenos Quantum
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Temenos Quantum is a mobile app development tool based on technology acquired by Temenos with Kony and the Kony development platform in late 2019. They state with it, businesses can deliver a multiexperience digital journey for customers. The platform supports the development of web and native mobile applications incorporating wearables, chatbots, augmented reality, and conversational apps.N/A
Pricing
Aspose.TotalSyncfusion Essential StudioTemenos Quantum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential Studio - Syncfusion Community License
$0
*The Syncfusion Community License includes free access to all 1,700+ controls and is available to companies and individuals with less than $1 million USD in annual gross revenue, 5 or fewer developers, and 10 or fewer total employees. Note: An entity or organization may not have ever received more than $3,000,000 USD in capital from an outside source, such as private equity or venture capital, in order to be eligible for the Community License.
Essential Studio - UI Edition
Custom Quote
per year Packages to suit teams of all sizes
Essential Studio - Document SDK
Custom Quote
per year Packages to suit teams of all sizes
Essential Studio - PDF Viewer
Custom Quote
per year Packages to suit teams of all sizes
Essential Studio - DOCX Editor
Custom Quote
per year Packages to suit teams of all sizes
Essential Studio - Spreadsheet Editor
Custom Quote
per year Packages to suit teams of all sizes
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aspose.TotalSyncfusion Essential StudioTemenos Quantum
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*The Syncfusion Community License includes free access to all 1,700+ controls and is available to companies and individuals with less than $1 million USD in annual gross revenue, 5 or fewer developers, and 10 or fewer total employees. Note: An entity or organization may not have ever received more than $3,000,000 USD in capital from an outside source, such as private equity or venture capital, in order to be eligible for the Community License.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aspose.TotalSyncfusion Essential StudioTemenos Quantum
Considered Multiple Products
Aspose.Total

No answer on this topic

Syncfusion Essential Studio
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
The products mentioned are not really in the same category as Syncfusion. As far similar type of products are concerned, we haven't used others. We have evaluated for sometime but did not use. The main reason was the support service.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
While both are great, Syncfusion® Essential Studio® offers Community License rather than a limited period Evaluation/Trial license.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
It displays Word documents in most accurate way.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Syncfusion beats the other because they have a great licence option for small companies.

For big companies with decent budgets, I find Kendo easier to use but it's only a matter of taste
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Radzen seemed like a quality product but we needed more control over the interface than they could allow. I don't recall the details about Telerik and Kendo. I think Telerik also rated high but was more expensive?
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Devexpress was late in developing Blazor controls so we refocused on Syncfusion. As I mentioned, Syncfusion has much better financial support for small businesses.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
I only used open source tools, as every other solution offered by companies are paid and they don`t offer any free license. Like I said before, the free license for developers and small businesses is a amazing feature that Syncfusion provides and they are the only one that do …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Yes, I use another framework at the same time. I am going to be very honest: the other framework is very good. There are two aspects, one positive and other negative: - The positive aspect of the other framework is the execution time. Is more faster than Syncfusion Essential …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Infragistics Ultimate UI - less versions, lack of Office document processing, few UI frameworks missing, worse ROI
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Firstly, there is a free version for small businesses and it allows you to jump start without risk. I found one of the other products a bit short in the number of out-of-the-box supported events handlers for each control and, although you can manually add them, I feel more …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Telerik is similar in content and functionality. I used it for 1 yr and switched to Syncfusion based on price. I have never considered going back to Telerik
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
I think variability and rich features and variable to connect to the business need.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
For the past eight years, we have not evaluated any other products, as we have found our current solution to be highly effective and have had no reason to consider alternatives.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
The free community license is a major element, but it also allowed a fast start with minimal learning curve compared to adopting alternative solutions.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Quite same but that documentation... Keep it as good as it is now.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Syncfusion is a clear winner over what Telerik has to offer in functionality, rapid development and hands down on support. I disliked how Telerik decides if they will fix reported bugs or suggested product enhancements. Syncfusion in my opinion is far more cost effective as …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
We evaluated DevExpress and two other libraries, whose names I've currently forgotten. But in the end, it was a race between DevExpress and Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition, as they both offer a great amount of components with rich documentation. In the end we …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
We are using this to developed windows form and I am fully satisfied with their performance and speed up development.it also provides easy to integrate with visual studio.it can also support vb.net, asp.net, MVC, and .net core web applications with a responsive user interface …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
We have tried Infragistics and DevExpress and didn't have the variety of components that we needed
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Currently using it but we will do more research on D3
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
They are basically on par, but the docs and in general, including support, Telerik is a bit superior. I find it to be better in terms of user-friendliness and also better polished UI wise, I mean, overall they just look better and offer somewhat better themes/skins to all the …
Temenos Quantum
Chose Temenos Quantum
We are using KDC to migrate EPIC applications. So far, we are using it for our projects, billing and finance apps. We are also working on extending it to other departments. It is being used by an entity (TSO). KDC got the best score in the PoC.
Chose Temenos Quantum
We evaluated variety of platforms like Xamarin, Sencha, PhoneGap. When we were initially evaluating Xamarin, it was not Microsoft and so the releases and features were not very streamlined. Also licensing was a issue with that.
Sencha was a very attractive cross mobile platform …
Best Alternatives
Aspose.TotalSyncfusion Essential StudioTemenos Quantum
Small Businesses
Syncfusion Essential Studio
Syncfusion Essential Studio
Score 6.9 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aspose.TotalSyncfusion Essential StudioTemenos Quantum
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aspose.TotalSyncfusion Essential StudioTemenos Quantum
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
The datagrid is probably their most popular control I would think. It is so flexible and configurable. Most of mine are plain views in ASP.NET Core, but I have a whole bunch that are dynamically created at runtime in my controller. That is so powerful.
Read full review
If your organization is smaller in nature and is looking for something out of the box, this platform may be for you. However if your organization is looking for something with added customization and a quick deployment, shift your attention in a different direction. The idea of the product is great and should allow for enhanced customization in the future; if it works properly. The analytics tools are promising but lack quite a lot.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Integrates well into Microsoft tech stack. i.e. ASP.NET, Blazor etc. So it acts as a plug-n-play, which is great!
  • Shrinks the development cycle without adding too much of its own ecosystem overhead.
  • Provides different UI skins so the controls don't appear as "stitched".
Read full review
  • Cross-platform mobile development - we used this for developing the app on a native platform (which could be iOS, Android). Kony offers tools that are useful because they decrease costs and increase the speed at which apps are developed. In addition, cross-platform mobile development tools are generally quite simple to use as they are based off of the common languages for scripting, including CSS, HTML, and JavaScript. It has become easy to find resources with the skill set especially because this is based out of common languages.
  • In Kony mobility platform Visualizer makes app development quick and easy. Tons of documentation online.
  • Used Kony to develop an amazing app that serves our customers well. WYSIWYG interface is great for building interfaces quickly. Build and test quickly for many different targets.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Most complex activities (beyond the out of the box examples) require a very extensive knowledge of javascript. This is not really a short coming of the product but rather a reality for the user who is trying to fully utilize the capabilities of the software.
Read full review
  • Manuals or instructions need to be streamlined with its high pricing.
  • It's a very intricate platform. It only performs moderately while the app is currently in operation.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It takes effort to include a new component library into existing software, especially in our case where we have 5 large applications that are written and maintained by about 100 developers. So changing such a core thing comes with a lot of effort. The other reason we will very likely renew our use of Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition is that it works really well and has helped us to speed up the development process.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
I would rate Syncfusion® Essential Studio® a 10 out of 10 for overall usability. The components are intuitive to implement, with clear APIs and consistent design patterns across the suite. This makes it easy for developers to get started quickly and reduces the learning curve even when working with new controls.
In addition, the documentation and sample projects provide practical guidance that helps accelerate development. The built-in customization options also allow us to adapt the components to fit our branding and business requirements without excessive effort. Overall, the usability is one of the key reasons why Syncfusion has become an essential part of our development toolset.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Although I have decades of software development experience, I had never created a website from scratch before, and my html and css skills are not particularly strong. Between documentation and incredible dedication from the support team they helped me overcome all of my challenges. It's amazing that they typically create sample code for most of the issues that I submitted. On rare occasions where I uncovered a defect they kept me informed as to its status, and typically resolved it in a short-term release, and/or gave me a reasonable workaround. They hopped on zoom calls with me on multiple occasions when necessary.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Feedback from the team has been very positive.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Firstly, there is a free version for small businesses and it allows you to jump start without risk. I found one of the other products a bit short in the number of out-of-the-box supported events handlers for each control and, although you can manually add them, I feel more comfortable to just have them ready. After using the free version I just felt in love with Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition controls and decided to stay with them; they have all I need and more. The usage of Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition controls is straightforward and intuitive. Support is world-class even for the free version; you get answers in 24 hours at most. Also, the support team is ready to remotely connect to your project in case it is needed; we have had one situation like this, and the issue was solved.
Read full review
We are using KDC to migrate EPIC applications. So far, we are using it for our projects, billing and finance apps. We are also working on extending it to other departments. It is being used by an entity (TSO).

KDC got the best score in the PoC.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • First of all, I think the best positive impact is the reduce of time development. I do not know exactly how much time, but certainly, using the framework we save a lot of effort and time.
  • About negative impact, sometimes using the controls of the framewrok have a signifcant impact in the execution time and page load.
  • And of course, the use of Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition has a significant impact of the learning of javascript and JQUERY.
Read full review
  • Positive on ROI. I'm constantly utilizing Kony since it's a robust tool capable of publishing.
  • It also shares prototype creations of apps in a highly intuitive and customizable environment. It provides a preview of apps in real-time. Collaboration is seamless. Important functionality includes smartphone features (without any written code involved) and accessibility to a browser, maps, and SMS.
  • Trying to understand the user manual can be challenging since there are way too many features available. All of them aren't really necessary for beginners. And they've yet to offer them in a "phased" approach.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Syncfusion Essential Studio Screenshots

Screenshot of An overview of Syncfusion® Essential Studio®, which is a software package that includes more than 1,600 components and frameworks for WinForms, WPF, ASP.NET (Web Forms, MVC, Core), UWP, WinUI, Flutter, Blazor, JavaScript, Angular, Vue, and React.Screenshot of The DataGrid control, which is a grid component that helps display and manipulate large amounts of data in a tabular format. Its feature set includes functionalities like data binding, sorting, grouping, editing, filtering, swiping, dragging, resizing, loading more items, pull-to-refresh, and exporting to Excel and PDF file formats.Screenshot of The PDF Viewer, which is .NET PDF class library developed with 100% managed C# code that can be used to create, read, and write PDFs.