AWS App Mesh vs. Azure App Service
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS App Mesh | Score5.8 out of 10 | N/A | AWS App Mesh is a service mesh that provides application-level networking to make it easy for services to communicate with each other across multiple types of compute infrastructure. App Mesh aims to give end-to-end visibility and high-availability for applications. There is no additional charge for using AWS App Mesh. Users pay for the AWS resources (EC2 instances or requested Fargate CPU and memory) consumed by the proxy that is deployed alongside containers. | N/A |
![]() Azure App Service | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | The Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby. | $9.49 per month |
| AWS App Mesh | Azure App Service | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Free and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS App Mesh | Azure App Service | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 82% Would buy again 9 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 89% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | |
| AWS App Mesh | Azure App Service | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS App Mesh | Azure App Service | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS App Mesh | Azure App Service | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 6.9 |
| Usability | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| AWS App Mesh | Azure App Service | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
| Pros |
| ![]()
|
| Cons |
| ![]()
|
| Usability |
| ![]()
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]()
|
| Return on Investment |
| ![]()
|
| ScreenShots |

