TrustRadius

AWS App Mesh vs. Traefik

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS App Mesh
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
AWS App Mesh is a service mesh that provides application-level networking to make it easy for services to communicate with each other across multiple types of compute infrastructure. App Mesh aims to give end-to-end visibility and high-availability for applications. There is no additional charge for using AWS App Mesh. Users pay for the AWS resources (EC2 instances or requested Fargate CPU and memory) consumed by the proxy that is deployed alongside containers.N/A
Traefik
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Traefik Labs in San Francisco develops cloud-native application networking software that helps developers and operations teams build, deploy and run modern microservices. Traefik Labs’ flagship solution, Traefik Enterprise, provides API management, ingress control and service mesh together with high availability, advanced security, autoscaling and dedicated support.N/A
Pricing
AWS App MeshTraefik
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS App MeshTraefik
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS App MeshTraefik
Considered Both Products
AWS App Mesh
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose AWS App Mesh
We conducted a comparative comparison between AWS App Mesh and Azure AKS with istio to better understand strengths, weaknesses and architectural differences between two services. While it provided a more managed and integrated experience, its feature limitations and upcoming …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose AWS App Mesh
Istio is high on operational costs as compared to AppMesh. HIgher learning curve for ISTIO as compared to AppMesh. Multi cluster support in AWS. App Mesh has IAM integration which is a plus for AWS workloads.
Traefik

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
AWS App MeshTraefik
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS App MeshTraefik
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS App MeshTraefik
Likelihood to Recommend
Useful in scenarios where we use a complex microservices-based implementation with the complexity of inter-service communication. Can use App Mesh with services running on any compute services such as Amazon ECS, Amazon EKS, and Amazon EC2. Can be used to isolate errors and pinpoint the error location and also to re-route.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Standardization of microservices communication.
  • Traceability and visibility of communication across microservices.
  • Identify and Isolate issues in microservices communication.
  • Monitoring and sending data to CloudWatch.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Complex setup and configuration - should provide a simplified onboarding process.
  • There is no RBAC style policies, which could improve security and control
  • No native rate limiting and circuit breaking.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
We rated AWS App Mesh as part of a comparison with Microsoft Azure AKS + Istio. While we rated its usability 6/10, recognizing its strengths in AWS-native integration, the difficult learning curve and limited flexibility made it less appealing for broader use. Also AWS announced the retirement of AWS App Mesh by the end of this year.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We conducted a comparative comparison between AWS App Mesh and Azure AKS with Istio to better understand strengths, weaknesses and architectural differences between two services. While it provided a more managed and integrated experience, its feature limitations and upcoming retirement led us to continue building AKS + Istio. AKS + Istio offers more flexibility, extensibility, and community support.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Basically it helped us evaluate its strengths and weaknesses relative to AKS + Istio
  • This knowledge helped us refine internal service mesh design choices and avoid potential risks in all platforms
  • Helped us prioritize enhancements in our Azure Setup.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots