AWS IoT Device Defender vs. Google Cloud IoT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS IoT Device Defender
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
AWS IoT Device Defender is a fully managed service that helps users secure fleets of IoT devices. AWS IoT Device Defender continuously audits IoT configurations to make sure that they aren’t deviating from security best practices. A configuration is a set of technical controls that help keep information secure when devices are communicating with each other and the cloud. AWS IoT Device Defender helps maintain and enforce IoT configurations, such as ensuring device identity, authenticating and…N/A
Google Cloud IoT
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
The Google Cloud IoT Core is a fully managed service that allows you to easily and securely connect, manage, and ingest data from millions of globally dispersed devices. Cloud IoT Core, in combination with other services on Cloud IoT platform, provides a complete solution for collecting, processing, analyzing, and visualizing IoT data in real time to support improved operational efficiency.N/A
Pricing
AWS IoT Device DefenderGoogle Cloud IoT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS IoT Device DefenderGoogle Cloud IoT
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
AWS IoT Device DefenderGoogle Cloud IoT
Internet of Things
Comparison of Internet of Things features of Product A and Product B
AWS IoT Device Defender
-
Ratings
Google Cloud IoT
6.9
2 Ratings
14% below category average
IoT Device Management00 Ratings5.22 Ratings
Device Security00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
IoT Data Management00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
IoT Analytics00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
IoT Integration00 Ratings5.42 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AWS IoT Device DefenderGoogle Cloud IoT
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Score 9.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Forescout Platform
Forescout Platform
Score 6.9 out of 10
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS IoT Device DefenderGoogle Cloud IoT
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
6.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS IoT Device DefenderGoogle Cloud IoT
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
We have used AWS IoT Device Defender to safeguard our client's IoT senors placed in a manufacturing unit for implementing Industry 4.0 solutions. Its machine learning and automation capabilities have ensured that we get alerts whenever something abnormal or spike in a particular metric is detected which lets us sleep at night. Didn't find any scenario where it is less suited.
Read full review
Google
I consider myself very techy and found Google Cloud IoT platform very challenging to manage. The lack of tutorials and discussions to understand how each section works is very challenging. I specifically made a connection after several hours to Google Nest to third-party integration, Home Assistant. Shortly after Google Cloud upgraded to a new version breaking the connection. This was extremely frustrating. No service should take several hours to figure out, in my opinion, if it does, the platform is doing a poor job of making it easy. I'm personally very discouraged any time I ever have to use this platform. It's very hard to find answers.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • software is having an easy interface
  • prevents malicious data inflow/outflow from the AWS resources
  • collect data from different devices
  • generating alerts in case of any threshold.
  • Unique identity per device
Read full review
Google
  • Integration with different brands of microcontrollers including the one currently used by Espresiff.
  • The platform is very robust and secure.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Support to more range of Application vulnerabilities
  • Data Management can be richer
  • Limited Computing Power at times
Read full review
Google
  • Not beginner friendly.
  • Needs more tutorials and walk throughs on how to get started.
  • Very complicated and unless you know what you are doing you will be lost.
  • Lack of material found on how to do each section / services.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Google
Although comparisons are hateful, even more so when we are talking about leading brands where the quality of their services are indisputable, the general environment of Google was more familiar to me since I use, for example, Google Firebase on a daily basis, where part of the concepts are similar, without Without a doubt, AWS services are excellent, but it was easier for me to go through the functions of Google Cloud IoT.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • It's ML part which is already trained and on the top of that we can add our own model to define device behaviors to monitor traffic and set the upmost security.
Read full review
Google
  • The amount of hours to get things integrated is negative.
  • The amount of hours researching how to get devices integrated is negative.
  • Overall the amount of time and effort getting things working has been a negative experience.
Read full review
ScreenShots