AWS Serverless Application Repository vs. Google Compute Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS Serverless Application Repository | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | The AWS Serverless Application Repository is a managed repository for serverless applications. It enables teams, organizations, and individual developers to store and share reusable applications, and easily assemble and deploy serverless architectures in powerful new ways. Using the Serverless Application Repository, users don't need to clone, build, package, or publish source code to AWS before deploying it. | N/A |
Google Compute Engine | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Google Compute Engine is an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) product from Google Cloud. It provides virtual machines with carbon-neutral infrastructure which run on the same data centers that Google itself uses. | $0 per month GB |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google Compute Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Prices vary according to region (i.e US central, east, & west time zones). Google Compute Engine also offers a discounted rate for a 1 & 3 year commitment. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google Compute Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Would buy again 45 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 44 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Happy with the feature set 44 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 31 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Implementation went as expected 41 Answers | |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google Compute Engine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google Compute Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google Compute Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.9 |
| Usability | - | 8.1 |
| Availability | - | 9.6 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 7.3 |
| AWS Serverless Application Repository | Google Compute Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Google Compute Engine Screenshots |






