Azure App Service vs. Azure Static Web Apps
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure App Service | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | The Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby. | $9.49 per month |
![]() Azure Static Web Apps | N/A | N/A | Azure Static Web Apps, available from Microsoft's Azure suite of apps and services, streamlines full-stack development from source code to global high availability. The solution helps to accelerate app development with managed global availability for static content hosting and dynamic scale for integrated serverless APIs. The service boasts a tailored local development experience, CI/CD workflows to build and deploy apps, and unified hosting and management in the cloud. | $9 per month per app |
| Azure App Service | Azure Static Web Apps | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Free and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains. | Bandwidth Overage - $0.20 per GB per subscription Storage - 2.00 GB / 0.50 GB / per app Enterprise-grade Edge - $17.52/per app/month | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure App Service | Azure Static Web Apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
82% Would buy again 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
91% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
89% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure App Service | Azure Static Web Apps | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure App Service | Azure Static Web Apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 | AccuWebHosting.Com Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 | AccuWebHosting.Com Score9.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure App Service | Azure Static Web Apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 6.9 | - |
| Usability | 6.5 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Azure App Service | Azure Static Web Apps | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |

