Azure App Service vs. Neocortix
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure App Service | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | The Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby. | $9.49 per month |
Neocortix | N/A | N/A | Neocortix, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, provides Distributed Cloud Computing services running on public Android phones. Neocortix Cloud Services provides scalable compute capacity, running on mobile devices all over the world. This revolutionary service delivers Cloud At the Edge, enabling capabilities in Load/Performance Testing, CDN Testing, Network Telemetry, 3D Image Rendering, Genomics, and Deep Learning. | $149 per month 50 Concurrent instances, 2000 Concurrent Users, Unlimited Tests/Month, 1600 Instance-Hours/Month |
| Azure App Service | Neocortix | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Free and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Azure App Service | Neocortix | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
82% Would buy again 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
91% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
89% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Azure App Service | Neocortix | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure App Service | Neocortix | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure App Service | Neocortix | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 6.9 | - |
| Usability | 6.5 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Azure App Service | Neocortix | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |

