Azure App Service vs. Oracle Application Container Cloud

Azure App Service

Oracle Application Container Cloud

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure App Service	Score 8.4 out of 10	N/A	The Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby.	$9.49 per month
Oracle Application Container Cloud	Score 9.8 out of 10	N/A	Oracle offers the Application Container Cloud, a PaaS supporting the development of cloud native, 12-factor applications on a modern polyglot platform with Java EE, Java SE, Node.js, PHP, Python, Ruby, GO and .NET.	N/A

Pricing

Azure App Service

Oracle Application Container Cloud

Editions & Modules

Shared Environment for dev/test: $9.49
per month
Basic Dedicated environment for dev/test: $54.75
per month
Standard Run production workloads: $73
per month
Premium Enhanced performance and scale: $146
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Azure App Service	Oracle Application Container Cloud
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Free and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Azure App Service	Oracle Application Container Cloud
Top Pros	Pro Visual studio Pro Easy to deploy Pro Integration with azure	Pro Ease of use Pro User friendly
Top Cons	Minus Hard to understand Minus Learning curve Minus Mobile app	Minus Direct access Minus Access to information

Features

Azure App Service

Oracle Application Container Cloud

Platform-as-a-Service

Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
	Azure App Service 8.2 4 Ratings 2% above category average	Oracle Application Container Cloud 5.0 1 Ratings 47% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces	9.34 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Scalability	9.74 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Platform management overhead	5.74 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Workflow engine capability	6.03 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Platform access control	9.64 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Services-enabled integration	9.74 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Development environment creation	9.64 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Development environment replication	10.03 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification	8.04 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Issue recovery	6.74 Ratings	5.01 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes	6.44 Ratings	5.01 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Azure App Service	Oracle Application Container Cloud
Small Businesses	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.3 out of 10	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.3 out of 10	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.3 out of 10	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Azure App Service	Oracle Application Container Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend	7.4 (8 ratings)	5.0 (1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	5.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (2 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Azure App Service	Oracle Application Container Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft You may easily deploy your apps to Azure App Service if they were written in Visual Studio IDE (typically.NET applications). With a few clicks of the mouse, you may already deploy your application to a remote server using the Visual Studio IDE. As a result of the portal's bulk and complexity, I propose Heroku for less-experienced developers. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Oracle For how it is used within the organization it is perfectly fine. We use it for benefits, salary, and vacation tracking. It does make it easy to find your information within the system and make changes. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Microsoft It has options to deploy using CI/CD. It has great integration with Azure Devops It has all the common runtimes, so we don't need to install softwares. Incentivized Rudolph Pereira Team Lead Read full review	Oracle Ease of use. User-friendly. Sleek layout. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Microsoft the learning curve can be tough (just like other azure services) the UX/UI could be more intuitive (just like other azure services as well) monitoring can be hard to understand Microsoft's learning resources are hard to understand Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Oracle Fewer tabs. More direct access to information. More insight into where approvals are within the system. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Oracle I am not a part of the team that would make this decision but as far as I know they are happy with the platform and how it performs. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Oracle Incredibly easy to use and learn how to use. The interface is extremely easy to use. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Microsoft We had an issue where we deployed too large of a resource and didn't notice until the bill came through. They were very understanding and saw we weren't utilizing the resources so they issued a generous refund in about 4 hours. Very fast, friendly, and understanding support reps from my experience. Incentivized Drew Harrison Programmer Read full review	Oracle The team who helps with the issue is very helpful when resolving the issue and usually can handle it in a very timely manner. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Oracle The system is very easy to use. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft Azure has many data center, their services are more reliable. Azure has way more features than both Linode and DigitalOcean. If someone wants a complete reliable service, he/she must go to Azure instead of Linode and DigitalOcean because even though azure charges more, it is worth the money you pay there. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Oracle No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Microsoft Reduced the deployment time of ASP .NET applications in the company. Gave us an alternative to quickly deploy our applications without granting access to the version control system to a third platform. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Oracle Employee Empowerment Reduced lagtime Connects correct people to correct situations Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots