What users are saying about
20 Ratings
67 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.3 out of 100
20 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.1 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Azure App Service

If you are developing an application in .NET with Azure DevOps included with CI/CD deploying on Azure App Service is the best solution. It is very easy to integrate with Azure DevOps (compared to ESB of Amazon Web Services). It will scale up your web servers based on load and requests.In some case when you are just creating a web page it is not necessary to use it. You might use Azure storage instead that is cheaper.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Java Cloud

Oracle Java Cloud is especially appropriate for moderate to complex Java applications. Due to BYOL licensing, it is also works well when you are planning to do dev and test in-house and then deploy it on Oracle Java Cloud. It is not well suited for simple Java applications due to the cost of Oracle Java Cloud. Simple applications don't need the fully managed aspect of Oracle Java Cloud.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Feature Rating Comparison

Platform-as-a-Service

Azure App Service
7.1
Java Cloud
8.0
Ease of building user interfaces
Azure App Service
7.0
Java Cloud
7.0
Scalability
Azure App Service
8.0
Java Cloud
9.0
Platform management overhead
Azure App Service
7.0
Java Cloud
8.0
Platform access control
Azure App Service
4.0
Java Cloud
6.0
Services-enabled integration
Azure App Service
9.0
Java Cloud
7.0
Development environment creation
Azure App Service
9.0
Java Cloud
9.0
Development environment replication
Azure App Service
9.0
Java Cloud
9.0
Issue monitoring and notification
Azure App Service
6.0
Java Cloud
9.0
Issue recovery
Azure App Service
5.0
Java Cloud
7.0
Upgrades and platform fixes
Azure App Service
7.0
Java Cloud
8.0
Workflow engine capability
Azure App Service
Java Cloud
9.0

Pros

Azure App Service

  • It has options to deploy using CI/CD.
  • It has great integration with Azure Devops
  • It has all the common runtimes, so we don't need to install softwares.
Rudolph Pereira | TrustRadius Reviewer

Java Cloud

  • Configuring and then deploying Java applications is straightforward and can be done very easily.
  • Management console for Oracle Java Cloud is integrated with the rest of the IT stack, making it easy to figure out performance bottlenecks in Java applications and Java PaaS.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Azure App Service

  • Jumps between resource sizes can get expensive
  • You may wind up putting a lot of eggs in one basket--not necessarily a con but something to keep in mind (most of your data will likely be managed and processed through Microsoft products/services if you fully commit to Azure App Service).
  • Learning new technology. If you're moving from on-premises to Azure App Service (or any cloud solutions), you'll likely have to rethink how things are done to achieve the same end results (and/or resources may become expensive quickly).
Drew Harrison | TrustRadius Reviewer

Java Cloud

  • Pricing can certainly be improved as the cost adds up for dev/test environments using the Oracle Java Cloud platform.
  • It is hard to customize Oracle Java Cloud for complex Java applications requiring high bandwidth memory and network requirements.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

Azure App Service

Azure App Service 9.4
Based on 7 answers
I give the Azure App Service support an 8 instead of a 10 because there are time when it is easier to google a problem and find an answer than it is to use the learning library to find an answer. I would say the universe of user group members willing to offer suggestions is amazing.
Richard Peterson | TrustRadius Reviewer

Java Cloud

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

Azure App Service

Azure has many data center, their services are more reliable. Azure has way more features than both Linode and DigitalOcean. If someone wants a complete reliable service, he/she must go to Azure instead of Linode and DigitalOcean because even though azure charges more, it is worth the money you pay there.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Java Cloud

Google App Engine is great for Java applications where you are using other Google components already, for example Google GCP, Google BigQuery, etc. Redhat, OpenShift, and Pivotal CloudFounder are great when the application is very complex and includes components that are Java and non-Java based (Python, etc). Amazon AWS is more difficult to configure than Oracle Java Cloud - Oracle Java Cloud has simpler UI.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Azure App Service

  • Reduced the deployment time of ASP .NET applications in the company.
  • Gave us an alternative to quickly deploy our applications without granting access to the version control system to a third platform.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Java Cloud

  • Positive impact on ROI by reducing the time to deploy Java applications in the cloud.
  • Positive impact on business objectives by reducing the CapEx needed to hire staff to deploy and then later maintain the Java instances.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

Azure App Service

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Java Cloud

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

Azure App Service
8.4
Java Cloud
8.0

Support Rating

Azure App Service
9.4
Java Cloud

Add comparison