What users are saying about
37 Ratings
139 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.3 out of 100
37 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.8 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Platform-as-a-Service

    8.7

    Azure App Service

    87%

    Java Cloud

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Azure App Service ranks higher in 11/11 features

    Ease of building user interfaces

    8.7
    87%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Scalability

    9.6
    96%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Platform management overhead

    8.4
    84%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Workflow engine capability

    8.0
    80%
    2 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Platform access control

    8.3
    83%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Services-enabled integration

    8.9
    89%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Development environment creation

    8.6
    86%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Development environment replication

    9.3
    93%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Issue monitoring and notification

    8.5
    85%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Issue recovery

    8.7
    87%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Upgrades and platform fixes

    8.4
    84%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Azure App Service is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.1

    Azure App Service

    81%
    7 Ratings
    8.0

    Java Cloud

    80%
    1 Rating

    Support Rating

    10.0

    Azure App Service

    100%
    4 Ratings

    Java Cloud

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Microsoft

    You may easily deploy your apps to Azure App Service if they were written in Visual Studio IDE (typically.NET applications). With a few clicks of the mouse, you may already deploy your application to a remote server using the Visual Studio IDE. As a result of the portal's bulk and complexity, I propose Heroku for less-experienced developers.
    Read full review

    Oracle

    Oracle Java Cloud is especially appropriate for moderate to complex Java applications. Due to BYOL licensing, it is also works well when you are planning to do dev and test in-house and then deploy it on Oracle Java Cloud. It is not well suited for simple Java applications due to the cost of Oracle Java Cloud. Simple applications don't need the fully managed aspect of Oracle Java Cloud.
    Read full review

    Pros

    Microsoft

    • It has options to deploy using CI/CD.
    • It has great integration with Azure Devops
    • It has all the common runtimes, so we don't need to install softwares.
    Read full review

    Oracle

    • Configuring and then deploying Java applications is straightforward and can be done very easily.
    • Management console for Oracle Java Cloud is integrated with the rest of the IT stack, making it easy to figure out performance bottlenecks in Java applications and Java PaaS.
    Read full review

    Cons

    Microsoft

    • the learning curve can be tough (just like other azure services)
    • the UX/UI could be more intuitive (just like other azure services as well)
    • monitoring can be hard to understand
    • Microsoft's learning resources are hard to understand
    Read full review

    Oracle

    • Pricing can certainly be improved as the cost adds up for dev/test environments using the Oracle Java Cloud platform.
    • It is hard to customize Oracle Java Cloud for complex Java applications requiring high bandwidth memory and network requirements.
    Read full review

    Pricing Details

    Azure App Service

    Starting Price

    $9.49 per month

    Editions & Modules

    Azure App Service editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    Shared Environment for dev/test$9.491
    Basic Dedicated environment for dev/test$54.752
    Standard Run production workloads$733
    Premium Enhanced performance and scale$1464

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Free and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains.

    Java Cloud

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    Java Cloud editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Support Rating

      Microsoft

      We had an issue where we deployed too large of a resource and didn't notice until the bill came through. They were very understanding and saw we weren't utilizing the resources so they issued a generous refund in about 4 hours. Very fast, friendly, and understanding support reps from my experience.
      Read full review

      Oracle

      No answers on this topic

      Alternatives Considered

      Microsoft

      Azure has many data center, their services are more reliable. Azure has way more features than both Linode and DigitalOcean. If someone wants a complete reliable service, he/she must go to Azure instead of Linode and DigitalOcean because even though azure charges more, it is worth the money you pay there.
      Read full review

      Oracle

      Google App Engine is great for Java applications where you are using other Google components already, for example Google GCP, Google BigQuery, etc. Redhat, OpenShift, and Pivotal CloudFounder are great when the application is very complex and includes components that are Java and non-Java based (Python, etc). Amazon AWS is more difficult to configure than Oracle Java Cloud - Oracle Java Cloud has simpler UI.
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Microsoft

      • Reduced the deployment time of ASP .NET applications in the company.
      • Gave us an alternative to quickly deploy our applications without granting access to the version control system to a third platform.
      Read full review

      Oracle

      • Positive impact on ROI by reducing the time to deploy Java applications in the cloud.
      • Positive impact on business objectives by reducing the CapEx needed to hire staff to deploy and then later maintain the Java instances.
      Read full review

      Add comparison