TrustRadius

Azure App Service vs. Wavenet ahasa

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure App Service
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby.
$9.49
per month
Wavenet ahasa
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
ahasa® is a Cloud-based platform that enables users to integrate and operate containerized applications using Kubernetes. Using the ahasa® platform, enterprises can design, integrate and deploy containerized applications, in their choice of either a Public Cloud such AWS, or a Private Cloud such as VMware. The platform changes the way mobile Operators, communication service providers and enterprises will consume software applications online.N/A
Pricing
Azure App ServiceWavenet ahasa
Editions & Modules
Shared Environment for dev/test
$9.49
per month
Basic Dedicated environment for dev/test
$54.75
per month
Standard Run production workloads
$73
per month
Premium Enhanced performance and scale
$146
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure App ServiceWavenet ahasa
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFree and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure App ServiceWavenet ahasa
Features
Azure App ServiceWavenet ahasa
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Azure App Service
8.7
5 Ratings
10% above category average
Wavenet ahasa
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces9.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability9.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead7.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability8.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control9.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration9.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation9.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery7.65 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes8.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure App ServiceWavenet ahasa
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.4 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure App ServiceWavenet ahasa
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure App ServiceWavenet ahasa
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
You may easily deploy your apps to Azure App Service if they were written in Visual Studio IDE (typically.NET applications). With a few clicks of the mouse, you may already deploy your application to a remote server using the Visual Studio IDE. As a result of the portal's bulk and complexity, I propose Heroku for less-experienced developers.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Global Wavenet
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • It has options to deploy using CI/CD.
  • It has great integration with Azure Devops
  • It has all the common runtimes, so we don't need to install softwares.
Rudolph Pereira | TrustRadius Reviewer
Read full review
Global Wavenet
No answers on this topic
Cons
Microsoft
  • the learning curve can be tough (just like other azure services)
  • the UX/UI could be more intuitive (just like other azure services as well)
  • monitoring can be hard to understand
  • Microsoft's learning resources are hard to understand
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Global Wavenet
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
I enjoy the fact that Azure App Service can be managed by the Azure portal and a fully graphical user interface, as well as from two different flavors of command-line interface, i.e. Azure CLI and Azure Powershell. By utilizing the Azure Cloud Shell, we are able to switch between Azure Bash (CLI) and Powershell at any given moment and manage the Azure App Service settings from devices of any form-factor (Web based management).
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Global Wavenet
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
We had an issue where we deployed too large of a resource and didn't notice until the bill came through. They were very understanding and saw we weren't utilizing the resources so they issued a generous refund in about 4 hours. Very fast, friendly, and understanding support reps from my experience.
Drew Harrison | TrustRadius Reviewer
Drew Harrison
Programmer
Read full review
Global Wavenet
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Azure has many data center, their services are more reliable. Azure has way more features than both Linode and DigitalOcean. If someone wants a complete reliable service, he/she must go to Azure instead of Linode and DigitalOcean because even though azure charges more, it is worth the money you pay there.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Global Wavenet
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Reduced the deployment time of ASP .NET applications in the company.
  • Gave us an alternative to quickly deploy our applications without granting access to the version control system to a third platform.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Global Wavenet
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots