TrustRadius

Azure Face API vs. Google Cloud Vision API

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Face API
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
The Face API available from Microsoft's Azure suite of services is an AI service that analyzes faces in images. It is used to embed facial recognition into apps for a secured user experience. No machine-learning expertise is required. Features include face detection that perceives facial features and attributes—such as a face mask, glasses, or face location—in an image, and identification of a person by a match to a private repository or via photo ID.
$9
30,000 transactions free per month, 20 transactions per minute
Google Cloud Vision API
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The Vision API on Google Cloud is a tool to create computer vision applications or derive insights from images and videos with pre-trained APIs, AutoML, or custom models.N/A
Pricing
Azure Face APIGoogle Cloud Vision API
Editions & Modules
Standard
$0.40
per 1,000 transactions (100M+ transactions)
Standard
$0.60
per 1,000 transactions (5-100M transactions)
Standard
$0.80
per 1,000 transactions (1-5M transactions)
Standard
$1
per 1,000 transactions (0-1M transactions)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Face APIGoogle Cloud Vision API
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
User Testimonials
Azure Face APIGoogle Cloud Vision API
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
Mostly Google Cloud Vision API is getting used for extracting values out of pdfs which are scanned images. We also tried using it in analyzing different images and their marketing campaign results based on different features it contains like color, objects, positioning, logos etc. Vision API could be used for in conjunction with LLM to provide a more detailed prompt for image generation.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
It’s pretty easy to get started and the docs are good, plus it supports many features like OCR and image labeling. The accuracy is also generally good and it scale well for bigger use.
But the setup can be a bit confusing, especially with billing and permissions. and also the pricing is also not always very clear, and debugging issues sometimes take more time then expected.
Overall, it’s powerful tool but not the easiest for beginners.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Google
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots