Azure Lab Services vs. Strigo

Azure Lab Services is incredibly beneficial to our school board as a replacement for high-end graphics workstations needed for courses utilizing 3d graphics - the Autodesk and Adobe suites of products. The devices have a cost that is considerably higher than our line of business devices. These high-end devices are designated only for use with those courses meaning that the devices remained underutilized. Azure Lab Services isn't a good replacement for regular workloads as the overhead for management is considerable compared to regular devices.

Incentivized

Just about anyone looking for an online training platform can use Strigo. The solution is extremely scalable. Organizations with just a few employees, up to ones with 1000's of employees can use Strigo and gain a benefit. Strigo's flexible features, smart automation and robust support will appeal to growing enterprises.

Incentivized

• 3d Graphics powered machines
• Ease of deployment
• Ease of Access
• Ease of Management

Incentivized

• Better organization integration
• improve integration with MECM/System Center/Intune
• Improve HTML5 interface

Incentivized

Azure Virtual Desktop is an excellent tool for extending your existing infrastructure to the cloud and providing the same experience to users in both on-premises and virtual environments. Azure Lab Services, with its quicker setup time, and lack of connection to existing domains provides the ability to quickly spin up virtual environments for use for experimentation, learning, or delivering production resources.

Incentivized

SkyPrep, Accord LMS, QT9 LMS were all more expensive and not required to meet our use cases

Incentivized

• Reduced Capital Costs for 3d Workloads
• Ability to transition to Hybrid or Learn@Home and provide curriculum resources
• HTML FrontEnd provides ease of use from any HTML5 device

Incentivized