TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Stack HCI vs. VMware Cloud Foundation

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Stack HCI

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft offers hyperconverged infrastructure solutions via Azure Stack HCI. Azure Stack HCI provides a variety of preferred hardware solutions for building a hybrid cloud infrastructure, allowing the user to run virtual machines on hyperconverged systems and use Windows Admin Center to connect to Azure for cloud services.

    $29

    per month

    VMware Cloud Foundation

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/AVMware Cloud Foundation is a hybrid cloud platform for managing VMs and orchestrating containers, built on full-stack hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) technology. With a single architecture that is desribed by the vendor as easy to deploy, VMware Cloud Foundation aims to enable consistent, secure infrastructure and operations across private and public cloud.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Stack HCIVMware Cloud Foundation
    Editions & Modules
    Developer
    $29.00
    per month
    Standard
    $100.00
    per month
    Professional Direct
    $1000.00
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Stack HCIVMware Cloud Foundation
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Stack HCIVMware Cloud Foundation
    Small Businesses
    StarWind HCA
    Score8.6 out of 10
    StarWind HCA
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    StarWind HCA
    Score8.6 out of 10
    StarWind HCA
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
    Score9 out of 10
    Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Stack HCIVMware Cloud Foundation
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Stack HCIVMware Cloud Foundation
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It will be effective for an organization that is planning to deploy the application on the cloud and as well as on-premise. Organizations planning to work on hybrid-based can go for it blindly If looking for security it's an ultimate solution, being it is hybrid-based security is well enhanced.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    It is best suited for an on-premise cloud solution where customer can shift their entire production environment. Also, the customer has a preference for a Homogenous Infrastructure Environment where budget is not a challenge. It is not at all suited for a Heterogenous Environment, e.g., a Public cloud where integration becomes a huge issue, also in SMB sections where budget is challenging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Azure Stack HCI operating system
    • Windows Admin Center
    • Hyper-V-based compute resources
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • Cloud enabled Solution.
    • Support Container based Apps.
    • Cost efficient.
    • Supports both Public and Private Environments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Interruptions are there when the connection is low.
    • Improvement needed on Integration feature.
    • A lot of issues were faced while implementing.
    • Documentation should be clear and straightforward.
    • Improvement needed on Documentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • The Deployment is complex.
    • Recommended Number of Physical Nodes is three or more; with less than 3 Nodes, it becomes difficult to install V-SAN.
    • Need for better integration. If we go on the public cloud, it is a huge challenge while integrate with an open source platform.
    • Cost can be marginally reduced. SMB segments still prefer a separate license instead of VCF, or they postpone their purchase plans.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    We can deploy the application into windows and Linux virtual machines in the datacentre, Azure service. It provides the latest security, performance, and hybrid capabilities, which now include Azure Arc enablement and new management scenarios through the Azure portal. GPU enablement and maximizing performance of we can go virtual desktop infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    Although the public Cloud Model follows Opex Costing Model, it actually leads to very high costs also, the infra model in my organization is not suited for a Public Cloud Model. Hence We decided on an On-Premise Model, and the best suited was VMware Cloud Foundation, which is a complete Software-Defined Scale-Out Architecture. I also prefer a Homogenous environment; i.e, support and services from a Single OEM, so that I Can get faster resolutions to my tickets raised.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • The upside is the integration feature.
    • Pricing is a little higher.
    • When compared with another platform, Azure Stack HCI is performing/ functioning brilliantly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • My organization has a size of 1300+ employees, using multiple applications and an exchange mail server that is hosted on On-Premise Cloud, hence scalability has not been a challenge.
    • Having hosted my Production environment and Mail exchange Server on VCF, there has been optimum resource utilization with very little scope downtime. Hence have been able to save a lot of funds on Hardware resources.
    • Due to the size of my organization and due the data load, I have been able to save on Resource Utilization and Organization Funds
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots