Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Stream Analytics
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers Azure Stream Analytics for IoT and connected devices, supporting real-time analytics and reporting.
$0.11
per hour with a 1 SU minimum
Confluent
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.
$385
per month
Google Cloud Dataflow
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Google offers Cloud Dataflow, a managed streaming analytics platform for real-time data insights, fraud detection, and other purposes.N/A
Pricing
Azure Stream AnalyticsConfluentGoogle Cloud Dataflow
Editions & Modules
Standard
$0.11
per hour with a 1 SU minimum
Dedicated
$0.11
per hour with a 36 SU minimum
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Stream AnalyticsConfluentGoogle Cloud Dataflow
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAzure Stream Analytics is priced by the number of Streaming Units provisioned. A Streaming Unit represents the amount of memory and compute allocated to your resources.Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Stream AnalyticsConfluentGoogle Cloud Dataflow
Features
Azure Stream AnalyticsConfluentGoogle Cloud Dataflow
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Azure Stream Analytics
6.1
1 Ratings
27% below category average
Confluent
9.1
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Google Cloud Dataflow
7.3
2 Ratings
9% below category average
Real-Time Data Analysis7.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources7.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Low Latency8.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools2.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Data wrangling and preparation7.01 Ratings00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out5.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data Enrichment7.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards00 Ratings8.02 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Machine Learning Automation00 Ratings00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Stream AnalyticsConfluentGoogle Cloud Dataflow
Small Businesses
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Confluent
Confluent
Score 9.3 out of 10
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.4 out of 10
Confluent
Confluent
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.2 out of 10
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.2 out of 10
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Stream AnalyticsConfluentGoogle Cloud Dataflow
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Stream AnalyticsConfluentGoogle Cloud Dataflow
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Data enrichment is effectively done in stream analytics also checking the values with different functionality like windowing and group by clause is effectively working.
Read full review
Confluent
If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.
Read full review
Google
It is best in cases where you have batch as well as streaming data. Also in some cases where you have batch data right now and in future you will get streaming data. In those cases Dataflow is very good. Also in cases where most of your infra is on GCP. It might not be good when you already are on AWS or Azure. And also you want in-depth control over security and management. Then you can directly use Apache beam over Dataflow.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Routing of data from multiple inputs to multiple output
  • You create your own user define function.
  • Intermediate query is working very effectively.
Read full review
Confluent
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
Google
  • Streaming, Real time work load
  • Batch processing
  • Auto scaling
  • flexible pricing
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Code competency is not that much effective
  • Ml models can't be integrated with stream analytics
Read full review
Confluent
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
Google
  • More templates for Bigquery and App Engine. There is only limited options for templates so the things we use can limit.
  • I would like native connectors for Excel (XLSX) to reduce the need for custom wrappers in financial pipelines.
  • Debugging Google Cloud Dataflow using only logs in Cloud Logging can be overwhelming sometimes, and it’s not always obvious which specific element in the flow caused a failure. IT uses a lot of time.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Confluent
No answers on this topic
Google
It really saved a lot of time and it's flexibility really can give you infra which is future-proof for most of the use cases may it be streaming or batch data. And with this you can avoid use of resource-heavy big data offerings.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Confluent
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Azure Stream Analytics is easy to implement and also to integrate compare to other services like iot analytics
Read full review
Confluent
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
Google
Google Cloud Dataproc Cloud Datafusion
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Very nice roi while using it.
  • Multiple integration is the best functionality
Read full review
Confluent
  • It enables us to develop event driven application.
  • It increases our ability to handle streaming data.
  • It reduces latency of communication.
Read full review
Google
  • cost saving from managing our own data center for ETL servers
  • consumption based pricing
  • with auto scaling feature, we were able to expand components to support work load
Read full review
ScreenShots