Azure VMware Solution vs. Public Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure VMware Solution
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Azure VMware Solution enables users to run VMware workloads natively on Azure. The user can move VMware-based workloads from the datacenter to Azure and integrate a VMware environment with Azure. This enables users to continue managing existing environments with the same VMware tools already in use while including Azure native services. Azure VMware Solution is a Microsoft service, verified by VMware, that runs on Azure infrastructure.
$10.41
per hour
Public Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Azure VMware SolutionPublic Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure VMware SolutionPublic Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Azure VMware SolutionPublic Cloud
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Azure VMware Solution
9.1
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Public Cloud
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure VMware Solution
-
Ratings
Public Cloud
8.6
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Cloud Management Security00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Cost Management00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Governance and Compliance00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Systems Integration00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure VMware SolutionPublic Cloud
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure VMware SolutionPublic Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure VMware SolutionPublic Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Cloud-Native Applications: If you are building cloud-native applications that are designed to run on Azure, AVS may not be the best solution. In this case, you should consider using Azure-native services, such as Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) or Azure Functions.Minimal Workloads: If you have a small number of workloads, it may not be cost-effective to use AVS. In this case, you can consider using Azure Virtual Machines (VMs) or other Azure services that are better suited for small workloads.Custom Hardware Configurations: If you require custom hardware configurations or specialized hardware, AVS may not be able to meet your requirements. In this case, you can consider using other Azure services, such as Azure Dedicated Hosts, that offer more flexibility in terms of hardware configurations.Cost-Sensitive Workloads: If you have cost-sensitive workloads, AVS may not be the best solution. While AVS offers many benefits, it can also be more expensive than other Azure services. In this case, you should consider using Azure services that are more cost-effective, such as Azure Virtual Machines.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
Best suited for environments where there are standard processes and no scope for customization and not suitable for industries where the business processes are dynamic and prone to changes frequently. Also, where the users are already experienced or users of SAP would help to easily help to adopt the cloud approach.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Create and Manage Virtual Machines
  • Multiple OS base Virtual Machines
  • Good Capacity Planning and Management
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
  • Scalability
  • Cost Savings
  • Increased Flexibility
  • Improved Safety
  • Ease of Data migration with the help of migration cockpit
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Easier access to features and editing your own dashboard
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
  • Additional processes
  • Better UI
  • Access
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Very good usable solution.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
It's very good compared to its competitors as great uptime, easy support and interactive User Interface makes it a wonderful solution.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Cost Savings: One of the key benefits of AVS is that it can help businesses save money by reducing the costs associated with maintaining and upgrading on-premises infrastructure.
  • AVS can help businesses improve their agility by enabling them to quickly provision and scale VMware workloads in Azure.
Read full review
Infomaniak Network
  • Less infrastructure
  • Quick and easy
  • Post-go-live maintenance
Read full review
ScreenShots