TrustRadius

bolt.new vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Applications

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
bolt.new
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
bolt.new is a platform used to build apps and websites by chatting with an AI builder. It features collaboration tool in a shared project workspace, and integrations with prototyping and development workflow tools.
$25
per month
IBM Cloud Pak for Applications
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Pak® for Applications (CP4Apps) is an end-to-end hybrid cloud application platform, providing flexibility for deployments, building new cloud-native applications, refactoring and re-platforming existing applications. Designed to leverage a collection of application runtimes, modernization tools and a Kubernetes container platform to adapt to their landscape needs.N/A
Pricing
bolt.newIBM Cloud Pak for Applications
Editions & Modules
Pro
$25
per month
Teams
$30
per month
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
bolt.newIBM Cloud Pak for Applications
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details10% discount for annual subscription.—
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
bolt.newIBM Cloud Pak for Applications
Small Businesses
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
bolt.newIBM Cloud Pak for Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
bolt.newIBM Cloud Pak for Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
bolt.new (StackBlitz)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Well suited for customers who are looking for cloud-adoption, and finally to meet the challenges of business innovation for the competitive advantage through DevOps.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
bolt.new (StackBlitz)
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Provides a fantastic range of Application runtimes allowing the most suitable runtime to be selected for the app being implemented.
  • After using Transformation Advisor for quite a while, it is an indispensable tool to help modernize, specifically from WebSphere and Tomcat, towards the lightweight, fast and efficient Liberty runtime.
  • The simplicity of the licensing by wrapping many products into a single offering with a different VPC weighting.
  • Allows us to modernize our runtime from WebSphere Application Server (or ND) to WebSphere Liberty core without sacrificing our WAS licenses.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
bolt.new (StackBlitz)
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • User Experience and Learning Curve
  • Integration with Third-party Tools
  • Pricing and Licensing Model
Nelson Lopez | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nelson Lopez
CEO (Chief Executive Officer)
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
bolt.new (StackBlitz)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Our customer mission-critical core banking applications like Temenos T24 run on best of the breed IBM WebSphere Application Server which is java based-application server. IBM has kept up the promise of providing support, fixpack, and any update. As far as I know, at least by 2030, IBM is committed to continue with WHE which gives customers confidence in their current investments.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
bolt.new (StackBlitz)
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • We have been able to migrate apps away from the expensive WAS-ND to the more cost-effective WAS-base without throwing away our WAS-ND licenses. With a 1:4 ratio of WAS-ND to WAS-base we've been able to we've been able to save in excess of 75% on licensing charges for these apps.
  • By having a license model based on VPC ratios (1:4:8 - WAS-ND:WAS-base:Liberty core) we've been able to move away from using license pooling resulting in over-allocating (i.e. wasting) CPU cores for each license pool, to using consolidated license pools hosting a combination of WAS-ND, WAS-base and Liberty-core. This has allowed us to reduce our licensing costs accordingly.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots