TrustRadius

BugBug vs. mabl

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BugBug
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
BugBug is a low-code test automation solution for QA testers, developers, and product managers. It offers complete automatization of end-to-end testing for websites and web applications. The tool enables users to automate regression tests and reduce costs. Its recording interface allows users to create an automated test in less than 5 minutes. With BugBug the user can: Record reliable end-to-end tests in just a few minutes Run tests in a browser or in the…
$0
per month
mabl
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
mabl is a regression test automation tool with test output visualization and performance regression for tracking the perceived speed of web apps and sites, from the company of the same name in Boston.N/A
Pricing
BugBugmabl
Editions & Modules
FREE Plan
$0
per month
PRO Plan
$49
per month
PARALLEL Plan
Contact Us
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BugBugmabl
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BugBugmabl
Considered Both Products
BugBug

No answer on this topic

mabl
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Chose mabl
We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the …
Features
BugBugmabl
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
BugBug
-
Ratings
mabl
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Record and Automate00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test Scheduling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Object Recognition00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BugBugmabl
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BugBugmabl
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BugBugmabl
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
We haven't found a scenario yet where it hasn't been appropriate. We did have one function on our application that mabl couldn't do, but they solved it and got back to us very quickly. Our application is web-based and mabl is able to handle this very easily. We use the command line runner a lot. Being able to easily and quickly change from a cloud based run to a local run has been fantastic. Setting up flows and environments is a wonderful feature
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • mabl trainer - record and play back test cases
  • Organization - labels and flows make this easy
  • Customer support!
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Asserts could be easier to add, but they aren't terribly hard
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the above tools, we are a small start up, and don't have a huge budget. Some tools listed didn't have the same functionality or ease of use with the record and playback. mabl works on our machines and integrates with our existing tools
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • We are able to more quickly automate UI tests
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
ScreenShots

BugBug Screenshots

Screenshot of Run tests in a browser or in the cloudScreenshot of Test editing, completed manually or by recording new stepsScreenshot of Built-in variables to run and maintain testsScreenshot of Test schedulingScreenshot of Test suites can be integrated with any CI/CD pipeline

mabl Screenshots

Screenshot of Testing the login flow of the Freshbooks web application. Each test step is created by interacting with your application and is recorded in the mabl Trainer.Screenshot of Parameterized JavaScript enables everyone to contribute to building automated tests.Screenshot of View of mabl's insights and reporting. In this view, we're looking at mabl's release coverage dashboard, which includes passing rate, quality metrics, and more.Screenshot of Quickly create Jira tickets directly from test failures. All of the test execution data will be automatically pulled into the issue in Jira.Screenshot of Setting up a test as a part of your workflow in GitHub Actions.