TrustRadius

Builder.io vs. Hygraph

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Builder.io
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Builder.io is a Visual Development Platform that offers an AI-powered design-to-code tool, a visual editor, and an enterprise CMS. It connects to any existing site or app and provides a visual drag-and-drop experience for managing content.
$19
per month (paid annually) per user
Hygraph
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Hygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.
$299
per month per project
Pricing
Builder.ioHygraph
Editions & Modules
Basic
$19
per month (paid annually) per user
Growth
$39
per month (paid annually) per user
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Professional
$299
per month per project
Scale
$899
per month per project
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Builder.ioHygraph
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMonthly plans also available.35% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Builder.ioHygraph
Considered Both Products
Builder.io

No answer on this topic

Hygraph
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of …
Features
Builder.ioHygraph
Hybrid CMS
Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Product A and Product B
Builder.io
-
Ratings
Hygraph
8.7
Ratings
0% above category average
Collaborative editing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Content templates00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Approval and authoring workflows00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Builder.ioHygraph
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Contentful
Contentful
Score 7.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Builder.ioHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Builder.ioHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
  • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
  • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
  • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
  • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
  • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
  • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots