C-Facts - Cloud Cost Management vs. ProsperOps

C-Facts - Cloud Cost Management

2 Reviews and Ratings

ProsperOps

4 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
C-Facts - Cloud Cost Management	Score7.3 out of 10	N/A	A (Multi) Cloud Cost Management solution that helps make the right business decisions, C-Facts is presented as Management Control Center. C-Facts organizes (multi) public cloud data so users have the right insights. The user can fully or partially allocate costs to different cost centers or value streams and add margins and/or discounts. Unassigned costs are directly visible. By giving stakeholders access to the reports via the C-Facts Management Control Center the user can…	N/A
ProsperOps	Score9.2 out of 10	N/A	ProsperOps is a fully automated, multi-cloud cost optimization platform for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Eliminating cloud waste and managing spend is one of the most persistent challenges for FinOps teams. Cloud usage is inherently elastic, but the financial instruments used to manage cost like Reserved Instances, Savings Plans, and Committed Use Discounts are rigid. ProsperOps bridges this gap by integrating automated rate optimization with intelligent workload…	N/A

Pricing

C-Facts - Cloud Cost Management

ProsperOps

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
C-Facts - Cloud Cost Management	ProsperOps
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Optional

No setup fee

—

—

User Ratings
	C-Facts - Cloud Cost Management	ProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend	7.3 (1 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	C-Facts - Cloud Cost Management	ProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend	C-Facts Discover unassigned/hidden costs, assign them, and monitor Set budgets in 3 tier model and manage Automated compliance check on actual invoices as received by cloud providers Transparent invoices/cross-charging throughout 3 tier model Compliance check with financial controlling principles Frits Veltink VP Corent Technology Read full review	ProsperOps Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Pros	C-Facts No answers on this topic	ProsperOps The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is. It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps. It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Cons	C-Facts No answers on this topic	ProsperOps The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for. When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Alternatives Considered	C-Facts No answers on this topic	ProsperOps To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of the tool's cloud cost control and visibility capabilities. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Return on Investment	C-Facts No answers on this topic	ProsperOps Our Effective Savings Rate has risen since we started using ProsperOps. Our AWS bill savings will cover the cost of the service. As much as 95.4% of our compute on-demand costs are covered by ProsperOps, and all of the savings are put to good use. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
ScreenShots	C-Facts - Cloud Cost Management Screenshots	ProsperOps Screenshots