Canonical LXD vs. Canonical OpenStack

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Canonical LXD
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Canonical LXD is a Linux container hypervisor.N/A
Canonical OpenStack
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Canonical OpenStack is the cloud openstack option from Canonical in the UK. Using private and public cloud infrastructure at the same time allows users to optimise CapEx and OpEx costs. Users can create cost-effective, enterprise-grade public cloud infrastructure on Ubuntu.
$75,000
fixed price
Pricing
Canonical LXDCanonical OpenStack
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Private Cloud Build
$75,000
fixed price
Private Cloud Build Plus
$150,000
fixed price
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Canonical LXDCanonical OpenStack
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAdditional features, functionality, and integrations are available via add-ons
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Canonical LXDCanonical OpenStack
Considered Both Products
Canonical LXD

No answer on this topic

Canonical OpenStack
Chose Canonical OpenStack
Ubuntu OpenStack has better horizontal scaling as it is designed to have open IaaS infrastructure. As Ubuntu OpenStack scales horizontally, it is designed to scale on hardware without specific requirements. Ubuntu OpenStack offers [a] rich set of services to build, manage, …
Chose Canonical OpenStack
Everybody knows VMWare which is the world's number one in data center infrastructure management. OpenStack is lot lot less expensive but doesn't offer all the functionalities you have with VMWare especially for High Availability and load balancing. You should go for OpenStack …
Best Alternatives
Canonical LXDCanonical OpenStack
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Canonical LXDCanonical OpenStack
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Canonical LXDCanonical OpenStack
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
If you need to support diverse infrastructures then you need OpenStack. Also if you can't afford to pay costly licenses for commercial products then it is a no brainer. If you need to quickly recover for failures OpenStack will provide self healing and automatic load balancing! Don't use it if your hardware is homogeneous.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Very easy to use, learning curve is very short. Don't need to invest months of training before using it
  • Well suited with Jenkins for automated tests
  • Works well on large sets of heterogeneous hardware
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • More customizable options while choosing virtual machine configurations would be great.
  • To have regular online learning sessions directly from Ubuntu OpenStack experts [to] help users and for those who implement it.
  • Giving admin more control on what privileges they can grant to their users.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Ubuntu OpenStack has better horizontal scaling as it is designed to have open IaaS infrastructure. As Ubuntu OpenStack scales horizontally, it is designed to scale on hardware without specific requirements. Ubuntu OpenStack offers [a] rich set of services to build, manage, orchestrate, and provision a cloud with great auto scaling capabilities. Hence OpenStack administrators can be confident and relaxed in managing them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Lighter on initial spending for the organization.
  • Deployments which have no vendor locking makes management decisions easier.
  • Support from great community saved lot of time for engineers managing it.
Read full review
ScreenShots