Causal vs. IDU

Definitely suited best for B2B / B2B2C product modelling. We used this for B2B / B2B2C / C2C and the C2C side of things was always more complex to model out due to this being dependent on marketing spend (CAC) and factors around virality which really cannot be forecasted (not a shortcoming of Causal, just implied by the mechanics of modelling)

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

Income Statements per cost centre (actual vs budget) that has been mapped to meet my business requirements. The ability to drill-down to the GL level in each cost centre when reviewing Income Statements. The ability to group Income Statements per region for ease of reporting. The Budget module that offers flexibility and automatic calculations based on inputs make budgeting easier.

IDU has the best features for budgeting, and it has eased our processes.

IDU compliments our finance processes - budgeting is a key process in our business and its worked well for us for many years

IDU is always available and takes less time to come up after power outages.

It takes less time to generate reports.

Support is always provided on time and with resolutions.

Well done

Online training and webinar always available.

We have not used or evaluated any alternative products. We have been using IDU for over 10 years and have not been in the market for alternatives.

It can accommodate changes to requirements.