TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Checkmarx vs. SonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Checkmarx

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/ACheckmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)N/A

    SonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe SonicWall Web Content Client (CFC) compares requested sites against its database of web sites to provide configurable content filtering.N/A
    Pricing
    CheckmarxSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CheckmarxSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    CheckmarxSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Small Businesses
    Rencore Code (SPCAF)
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security
    Score9.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security
    Score9.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CheckmarxSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CheckmarxSonicWall Web Content Filtering Client (CFC)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Checkmarx
    If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    When the user is connecting to the internet and should not access some social media website or malware sites or unauthorized websites which may distract users and affect the productivity so to avoid any problems. It is a very simple setup. It is very easy to deploy, configure, and implement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Checkmarx
    • Detects security vulnerabilities in source code with accuracy and detail.
    • Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, IDEs, and repositories.
    • Provides clear reports and actionable fix recommendations for developers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • In built customized policies
    • Control access to unsecure web content
    • Application traffic analytics
    • IP-based HTTPS content filtering
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Checkmarx
    • Scan duration
    • False positives
    • Integration with other tools like Jenkins comes with some inconveniences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • Malware scanning
    • Content Filtering Client for roaming devices
    • Cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Checkmarx
    Their API based customizations which I leveraged to create an ASPM package, which is developer friendly and can extend above the dashboard features, other ones are UI which is great and feels clutter free. Menu and navigation is also good so as support. Only drawback is sometimes scan takes longer which I feel so can be reduced
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Checkmarx
    Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    Easy to setup and more stable solution. User friendly interface. Scalable and also in terms of cost it seems to be affordable solution with the best in-class protection benefits and other on demand features like dynamically updated
    rating architecture and high-performance web caching and
    rating architecture
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Checkmarx
    • Improved ability to provide high level of IA confidence
    • Improved confidence in application-level security
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SonicWall
    • Improves Productivity
    • Ensures safe environment by allowing genuine traffic
    • Continued productivity helps to regain ROI in more figures
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots