Checkmk vs. Tenable Security Center
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Checkmk | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Checkmk is a solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors. It can be deployed under all major Linux distributions or users can run it as Docker container or virtual appliance on other operating systems including Windows. The tool is available as a Raw Edition, which is open-source, and as an Enterprise Edition with a many additional enterprise features. The… | $0 up to 10 systems |
Tenable Security Center | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises. | N/A |
| Checkmk | Tenable Security Center | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | $600 for up to 3,000 Services / around 100 hosts | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Checkmk | Tenable Security Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Checkmk | Tenable Security Center | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring Tasks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Management Tasks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Checkmk | Tenable Security Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon CloudWatch Score7.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | LogicMonitor Score8.9 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ManageEngine Site24x7 Score10 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Checkmk | Tenable Security Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.4 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Checkmk | Tenable Security Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



