Checksub vs. Final Cut Pro

Checksub

Checksub

0 Reviews and Ratings

Final Cut Pro

Final Cut Pro

133 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Checksub	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	N/A	$18.90 per month
Final Cut Pro	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	Apple offers Final Cut Pro, a video editing platform featuring optimized for a high performance machines and supporting a wide range of quality effects.	$299.99 per license

Pricing

Checksub

Final Cut Pro

Editions & Modules

Basic: $18.90
per month

Final Cut Pro X: $299.99
per license

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Checksub	Final Cut Pro
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Checksub	Final Cut Pro
Considered Both Products	Checksub No answer on this topic	Final Cut Pro Marc Blake Producer Chose Final Cut Pro I listed products that I use "a lot" and have skill with. I understand these are not "like" FCPX but everyone of them is part of an overall workflow that supports what I do and the fact is that FCPX is part of this production team of apps and third party resources. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Final Cut Pro Against all other platforms, Final Cut Pro has provided the most consistent, comprehensive and complete package over any other platform we have tried. The thoroughness of the application and the ease of use make it our no-brainer, must-have editorial tool. All of our top … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Final Cut Pro I choose FCP because I am an Apple user and use a MacBook Pro M3, and Final Cut Pro is best optimized with it. It doesn't work on Mac; it flows like water, so yeah, as an Apple user, FCP is my first choice. Another aspect is it's a low-cost solution, so it gives me lifetime … Incentivized Helpful? François Lavallée president Chose Final Cut Pro Adobe Premiere is similar to Final Cut Pro in terms of quality and usability. Several of my friends and partners use Adobe Premiere, and we all agree they are identical. The fact that I use Apple computers made the choice easy, as Final Cut is fully integrated with the other … Incentivized Helpful? Michael Dancy video editor Chose Final Cut Pro Price, price, price. DaVinci may be free, but the learning grade is a bit higher, and you need a high-end machine to make it sing. Premier Pro is a subscription service bloated with tools you'll never use. FCPX is priced decently and is easy to learn. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Final Cut Pro The magnetic timeline, live previews of effects, and general ease of editing. In other words, I think it works. Incentivized Helpful? Abhinav Bajpai Graphics Artist Chose Final Cut Pro Adobe Premiere Pro and VEGAS Pro Incentivized Helpful? Josh Meeder Owner Chose Final Cut Pro iMovie is great for rapid editing of videos taken with your iPhone. It is lightweight, fast and simple. However it is extremely limited. You can not layer videos or images. The titles, Transitions and Effects are basic and there are only a few of them. You really can't … Incentivized Helpful? Shubham Verma Video Editor Chose Final Cut Pro Final Cut Pro X is a one time purchase and Adobe Premiere Pro has monthly subscription. Final Cut Pro X takes less time to arrange your clips and Adobe Premiere Pro takes most time to arrange your clips. A beginner can do work easily on Final Cut Pro X, but a beginner can not … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Final Cut Pro I've used iMovie and Final Cut Pro. Final Cut Pro is iMovie on steroids. Incentivized Helpful? Hilary Hobbs Senior Video Editor Chose Final Cut Pro Premiere and Final Cut are very similar is usage. Final Cut has less crashing and lag, but does not work well with Adobe products. You'd basically have to use all different softwares to use it best. Davinci is a different beast with a color grading portion that is unmatched by … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Final Cut Pro I have used both Final Cut Pro X and iMovie and Final Cut Pro just seems to be my go-to. Final Cut Pro X just seems to have more tools, features, functionality, and more. It also integrates with Compressor which helps when reducing file sizes. There seems to be more extras that … Incentivized Helpful? Brendon Brown Marketing Technologist Chose Final Cut Pro I find that many users have some iMovie experience when approaching Final Cut Pro X, and thus segue quickly to it. Premiere is also a good product, timeline-based, with a very mature expansion market, possibly with a cluttered interface. DaVinci Resolve is the free product from … Incentivized Helpful? Alex Pegg Owner Chose Final Cut Pro Final Cut [Pro X] has way more features in a much better layout. Although it is more expensive, I believe the improved performance and advanced level of features is worth it if you are serious about video production and professionalism. Incentivized Helpful? Mike Muller Executive Vice President Chose Final Cut Pro Final Cut Pro X stakes up well against the main competitors such as Adobe Premier Pro and DaVinci Resolve. Each has their strengths but Final Cut Pro X provides a competitive set of features but is optimized for the Macintosh environment. With the new M1 chips, Final Cut Pro … Incentivized Helpful? Rob Gokee Composer Chose Final Cut Pro Final Cut Pro X is basically the professional upgrade of iMovie - if you're familiar with that product, stepping up to FCPX is a natural progression. Avid Media Composer and Adobe Premiere Pro are both industry standard products - in all honestly, if you're an editor, you … Incentivized Helpful? FH Frankie Heath Director of Social Marketing Chose Final Cut Pro Final Cut Pro X has all the same features that the other two have. The price point for both Final Cut Pro X and Premier Pro are very comparable and DaVinci Resolve is a free software but I found it to not be very user friendly. We have access to both Premier Pro and Final Cut … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Final Cut Pro I briefly experimented with Adobe Premiere but wasn't crazy about the user interface. I'm so used to Final Cut Pro X and it's become such a mainstay for me that I saw no need to pursue an alternative. Final Cut Pro X certainly delivers worlds above your customary free editing … Incentivized Helpful? Michelle Green Arnson Marketing and Communications Manager Chose Final Cut Pro I have hated iMovie since its inception. This probably says more about me, but I've never been able to figure out how such a simple piece of software can make me feel like such a dope! It's certainly improved over the years, and I have even used it in a pinch when I didn't have … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Final Cut Pro Final Cut Pro X is much easier to navigate and more user-friendly than Adobe Premiere. It is something a beginner can pick up and have an easy time editing, and then an experienced pro can really dig in and make something amazing out of it. Premiere can be a train wreck from … Incentivized Helpful? Seth Paine Web & Media Developer Chose Final Cut Pro I have used Adobe Premiere Pro but I keep going back to Final Cut Pro X because it is easier to use. At some point, I will learn Premiere Pro because from what I have heard it is much more powerful, but I am staying with Final Cut Pro for now because it is much easier to use. Incentivized Helpful? JM Joel McAfee Producer Chose Final Cut Pro I first learned to edit on Adobe Premiere Pro, and then FCP7. Comparatively, FCP7 just worked. Adobe crashed all the time (back in the day). Apple clearly also had the edge on the user interface - not just doing what NLEs had been doing for years but making improvements to the … Incentivized Helpful? Stephen Wittmaak Creative Designer & Content Specialist Chose Final Cut Pro Ease of use and intuitive menus systems a no brainer. Incentivized Helpful? Daniel Epstein Executive Producer Chose Final Cut Pro FCPX is very similar to Premiere Pro, and the two software are locked in a competition. Some years Premier is better, some years FCPX is better. I would say FCPX is more stable with fewer crashes, but Premier sometimes lets you customize the view a bit more. Flash is good for … Incentivized Helpful? Kyle Trail Training Content Developer Chose Final Cut Pro There's no comparison really. They're all non-linear editors, but FCPX is in a league of it's own. Above the rest. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Checksub	Final Cut Pro
Small Businesses	iMovie Score 10.0 out of 10	iMovie Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	iMovie Score 10.0 out of 10	iMovie Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Vyond Score 8.7 out of 10	Vyond Score 8.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Checksub	Final Cut Pro
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.8 (0 ratings)
In-Person Training	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Checksub	Final Cut Pro
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	It's an excellent tool, but maybe too complicated for novice video makers...so not 10. Apart from this, the one thing that could be improved ( and maybe I am a novice and cannot find how to do this!!) is creating videos with much smaller file sizes. Most of the videos in 720 are over 1 GB, and I have to use third-party software to reduce the size ( e.g., Handbrake). This is the one thing I would improve. The rest of the software is very well designed. I would love to know more easily how to use some of the tools, but my usage is very limited anyway. I do not have to buy an annual license, which is fantastic. It is expensive to start using, but there are no annual fees afterward. Perfect for my business. Incentivized François Lavallée president Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Adheres to the conceptually easy timeline model, thus making simple onboarding. Feature-rich toolset which allows for incredible product manipulation from the get-go Expandability via a vibrant plugin ecosystem. Final Cut plugins are broadly developed. Rich integration with studio products: Motion, Compressor Version updates exhibit a product team in touch with what the market needs Incentivized Brendon Brown Marketing Technologist Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Would be nice to have more built in exporting options for those of use who don't know how to compress videos well. More built in effects would be a plus. I always struggle with adding text but it could just be me. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	It's clever as can be software-wise. The learning curve wasn't insane. I probably use it with 60% efficiency and I am VERY productive at the rate. In fact, I'm so good at that rate that I don't even bother to become 70 or 80 percent more efficient. I'm doing fine Incentivized Marc Blake Producer Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Most of the support I need, I find online. While Apple has a Q/A section on their site, it's not always beneficial in answering the questions that I have. With that said, they regularly update the software, and when updates lead to crashes, they usually have another update not far behind. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	No answers on this topic	Implementing Final Cut Pro into the organization was a smooth transition from what we didn't had. We felt we went from zero to hero with this software, due to all the great features that we learned. We took some time in training staff on how to use the software but at the end, this was very useful and important. Incentivized Horacio Carcamo Product Development Asst. Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Against all other platforms, Final Cut Pro has provided the most consistent, comprehensive and complete package over any other platform we have tried. The thoroughness of the application and the ease of use make it our no-brainer, must-have editorial tool. All of our top editors won't work with anything else and that is what makes our work consistent and reliable and easy to do the work we need to do without having to 'fight' with the software, application or platform to get the best possible results. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Over the nine years that I've been using Final Cut, it's paid for itself multiple times. Once you learn the tool, it can be used quickly and efficiently. It only works with Macs but can also be used on a iPad if you are budget conscious. Incentivized Michael Dancy video editor Read full review
ScreenShots