CipherTrust Container Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CipherTrust Container Security
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Encryption and data protection specialist Thales eSecurity headquartered in San Jose offers CipherTrust Container Security (formery Vormetric), encrypting and securing access to containerized applications and data.N/A
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) for Azure, on-premises, and multicloud (Amazon AWS and Google GCP) resources.N/A
Pricing
CipherTrust Container SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CipherTrust Container SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
CipherTrust Container SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CipherTrust Container SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(69 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(14 ratings)
User Testimonials
CipherTrust Container SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Thales
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I think it's good for cloud-native companies. A company that, from day zero, they're like, "We're going cloud, and this is how we're going to do it." They get it. It works well for them. Smaller organizations that are under X amount of resources- I don't know what that X might mean- but I feel like it plays well in smaller, more nimble organizations. If you're an older organization or if you're extremely large, it starts becoming a little difficult to manage at scale. And you have to sometimes throw bodies at the problem. Maybe not the most eloquent way of saying it, but that's what it feels like.
Read full review
Pros
Thales
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • It's really well laid out, with an easy-to-use, accessible UI.
  • With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, it has everything you need with the Safelink attachment, the Safelink emails for URL, the way it scans those URLs and attachments within the product, and you're seeing the results. And that adds an extra layer of security for the user, so you feel comfortable knowing the product monitors those. That's something I really like about that product.
Read full review
Cons
Thales
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • Integrations with on-premise workloads can sometimes be challenging. Needs improvement and well standardised integration points
  • Vulnerability categories can be difficult to understand. It should allow teams to focus on critical findings and help them keep aside low-severity or suppressed vulnerabilities
  • Pricing can be improved as it can be over-priced for smaller businesses and would potentially affect their ROI due to the small scale
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Thales
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It is a great product that integrates nicely when running an Azure platform and even multi-cloud environment. Not looking for point-solutions but a suite that answers most requirements. It is very comfortable being able to use KQL, workbooks and automation that is native to the azure platform
Read full review
Usability
Thales
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I would give a rating of nine for the following reasons: - easy to use dashboard with a clear view of our entire security posture -security, recommendations are easy and practical to follow -helps prioritise high risk issues instead of treating all alerts equally
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Thales
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I believe Microsoft Defender for Cloud stacks up well against the other tools we looked at. It is native to the Azure platform and provides the same insights as the other tools. We selected Microsoft Defender for Cloud because it integrates well with the Azure resources and gives the needed insight, security alerts and recommendations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Thales
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • Ensuring compliance with data protection regulations can prevent costly fines and legal issues, positively impacting ROI.
  • Effective cloud resource protection can optimize cloud spending and resource utilization, ultimately reducing cloud infrastructure costs.
  • The subscription costs associated with Defender for Cloud can add to an organization's operational expenses, impacting ROI.
  • Smaller organizations may find the feature set and complexity of Defender for Cloud unnecessary, potentially overinvesting in security solutions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Screenshots

Screenshot of Remediation of critical issues in codeScreenshot of Cloud security benchmark mapped to industry FramworksScreenshot of Prioritization of critical risks with contextual threat analysisScreenshot of Workload protectionScreenshot of Unified DevOps VisibilityScreenshot of Visualizations to improve security posture proactively