Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI) vs. Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) is network virtualization technology.N/A
Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)
Score 4.6 out of 10
N/A
Nuage Networks, a Nokia company, offers the Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP), which provides software-defined networking (SDN) and policy-based automation for cloud deployments. Designed for large enterprises and service providers, the vendor boasts supporting clouds of all sizes and architectures, from datacenter private clouds to large enterprise wide area networks (WANs) and some of the largest public clouds in the world. The software-defined networking (SDN) solution's…N/A
Pricing
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco ACINuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)
Considered Both Products
Cisco ACI
Chose Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)
ACI is more easiest and no more care about the underlay/overlay config
Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)

No answer on this topic

Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Catalyst Center
Cisco Catalyst Center
Score 8.4 out of 10
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Catalyst Center
Cisco Catalyst Center
Score 8.4 out of 10
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(63 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.6
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.6
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (Cisco ACI)Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP)
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Well suited to data center deployments with storage and compute to host applications. When deployed with VMWARE and/or hyperconverged infrastructure you get a good solution that is reliable and robust and can support a vast array of solutions. Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure works on any sized solution however, it's more appropriate to mid to large scale deployments.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
I can recommend the use of this software, the objective points that we had as an organization for months could be met. I am not saying that it is free of problems but it gives peace of mind and confidence that it is backed by a large company in the technology industry.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • The REST API allows your to programmatically interact with the network and make massive changes very quickly when needed.
  • The API allows you to tie together Server Provisioning tools, storage provisioning tools, into an orchestration platform such as Ansible to streamline new deployments and builds.
  • New Deployments are extremely simple once you've worked out your programatic deployment process. We can deploy new clients/tenants in seconds rather than days or weeks like it used to take.
  • Replacing failed switches/apics/etc is also extremely easy.
  • Tightly couple the underlying Network Infrastructure to VMWare Deployments to allow VMs to move anywhere in the datacenter at the drop of a hat.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Cons
Cisco
  • The APIC web UI is slow. Even on the newer UCS systems it is laggy.
  • The terminology for some of the objects is really confusing for someone that never used Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure. It would be at least helpful if there would be a link to a reference of the "classical" terms in the web UI.
  • The cost of the hardware, together with the management platform, is high. It is difficult to convince my management layer why the ease of manageability outweighs the high price.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
  • There are certain tools that need training to be able to use them. One of them is SASE which requires reading long documentation and the support of qualified engineers is needed. I think this is difficult and does not allow you to explore all areas of the Nuage environment.
  • There is intermittence in the afternoon hours. I mean by this that in the afternoon hours from 6 to 10 pm the platform does not load in the way it should, filling options are slowed down and the same thing happens in the early morning hours, the support team has not yet determined the exact reason for this.
  • Volume discount could not be negotiated. That in this case a really extensive investment was requested for first-time use of the product.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
Cisco ACI is doing exactly what was intended for it to do, that is support our next generation data centre, improve security, and increase resiliency. Migrating to another platform would be a waste of time, resource and energy, which could be better spent migrating more legacy applications into the Cisco ACI fabric.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
Cisco ACI has changed the traditional data center model into a new era of automation and agility. The product was considerably easy to deploy met all the expectations. In terms of usability, ACI provides a unified interface for managing the whole infrastructure in one place which is the main benefit for users (admins)
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Cisco
no outages
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Performance
Cisco
I do not give it 10 because the platform evolves more and more every day in the data traffic of the datacenter. But the implementations that they carry out for different clients of the platform are very happy with the result of the same over time. Another point that you notice about the platform, despite its good performance, is the low use of energy used by this 24x7 on, it is a good fact to take into account for our environment.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
Cisco provides users and partners with a multitude of data for you to consume. I think that the stuff in the public domain goes a long way to assisting you find any answers you may need, plus insights and information from areas such as DevNet provide you with access to more than just the traditional release notes and the like
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Cisco
The Cisco ACI training provided by Cisco was in depth, covered all of our requirements, and allowed us to implement and maintain the platform without issues.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Cisco
Not applicable
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
NSX-T and ACI both are definitely awesome products. I tend to use ACI in networks that have more barebone and/or alternative hypervisors. NSX still works best in VMware heavy networks. Another consideration is where the network is managed, by which team. If the network is solely managed by the network team ACI tends to be a better fitting solution. Also since ACI is a complete solution you don't need any other products. If you implement NSX you will still need a physical network.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Cisco
Cisco ACI scales well and is suited in scenarios such as multi-cloud or large data centre implementations. It is not suited to smaller deployments as the efficiencies that it provides are not fully realised. It is well suited in large environments that contain both virtual and bare-metal machines allowing a great deal of flexibility. It is also perfect to support multi-tenancy platforms.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Positive impact moving off of legacy to ACI has shorten costs of operations.
  • Native support for automation makes deployment easier and takes few mins than large amount of hours that can bring costs (OT over time) since it takes minutes to deploy this OT cost has decreased.
  • Troubleshooting made easier, this gains customer trust, therefore we get to spend less time trying to solve an issue and less operations costs.
Read full review
Nokia Networks
  • It has allowed us to unite different computer methodologies for the control of breakdowns in the cloud.
  • This supports commitment and meets business objectives in less time. This is simpler and the benefit is obvious.
  • Improving incorrect procedures in this sense allows us to anticipate correcting errors by giving us alerts and avoiding wasting too much time solving specific problems in the future.
  • Meet business objectives in months and it has been surprising. A specific business objective was to improve our facilities to be able to deliver faster service to our customers and achieve higher profit income.
Read full review
ScreenShots