Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued) vs. Elastic Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cisco IPS Sensors have reached EOL, and EOS.N/A
Elastic Security
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Elastic Security equips analysts to prevent, detect, and respond to threats. The free and open solution delivers SIEM, endpoint security, threat hunting, and cloud monitoring. The solution encompasses Elastic SIEM, which brings Elasticsearch to SIEM and threat hunting. The Elastic Agent (or Elastic Endpoint Security based on the former Endgame security product acquired by Elastic in late 2019) brings signatureless malware prevention to endpoints, as well as security data collection for…N/A
Pricing
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Elastic Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Elastic Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Elastic Security
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Elastic Security
Small Businesses
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Elastic Security
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco IPS Sensor (Discontinued)Elastic Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
IPS sensors are more suited for companies that do not have visibility into their network with third-party analyzing tools. Scenarios would be to place IPS sensors at the perimeter firewalls mainly. IPS sensors are less appropriate for companies that have third-party analyzing tools that will mitigate vulnerabilities and malicious traffic and activities already.
Read full review
Elastic
I believe Endgame is well suited to organizations that have their own Cybersecurity department. Its not well suited for organizations that don't have a Cybersecurity department.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Identifies and blocks malicious traffic.
  • Detects unwanted traffic and allows your company to be proactive, let alone reactive.
  • Comprehensive Threat protection allows companies to adjust thresholds and policies at will.
Read full review
Elastic
  • Identify 0-day malware.
  • Provides a few forensic details on endpoints.
  • Very easy to administer.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • The web GUI is somewhat slow.
  • Sometimes difficult to adjust policies.
  • Fail open feature may not work properly all the time.
Read full review
Elastic
  • I would love that it provided more memory analysis details.
  • Being able to edit sensor profiles after creating them.
  • I would love it if it provided more automation features.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
Cisco TAC has been great at helping with configurations and issues that may arise
Read full review
Elastic
Even though their support is good, I think there are some areas where they need to provide more thorough solutions to issues, some of their solutions are pretty basic and have already been tried.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
IPS sensors provides the necessary network visibility my company needs to satisfy its security appetite. By doing so, we have been able to stay compliant and up to date with today's network security requirements and procedures. We are able to be proactive with vulnerabilities and reactive to malicious traffic and intrusions in our day to day operations.
Read full review
Elastic
Endgame is based on the MITRE framework which has proven to be a successful framework to identify various attack patterns that attackers use. Also, compared to the others it's easier to administer and manage.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Provided less need to purchase third party analyzing tools.
  • Needed more dedicated staff to build/review/and maintain policies and such.
  • Answers companies need for network security.
Read full review
Elastic
  • Being able to identify threats we couldn't identify before.
  • Easier management of endpoints.
  • Being able to immediately isolate endpoints remotely that have high severity threats.
Read full review
ScreenShots